Tight control of mild‐moderate pre‐existing or non‐proteinuric gestational hypertension

Background The question of the target blood pressure in pregnant women with mild‐moderate hypertension continues to be an area of debate. Objectives To compare tight versus very tight control of mild‐moderate pre‐existing or non‐proteinuric gestational hypertension for improving outcomes Search meth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2011-07, Vol.2011 (7), p.CD006907-CD006907
Hauptverfasser: Nabhan, Ashraf F, Elsedawy, Maged M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The question of the target blood pressure in pregnant women with mild‐moderate hypertension continues to be an area of debate. Objectives To compare tight versus very tight control of mild‐moderate pre‐existing or non‐proteinuric gestational hypertension for improving outcomes Search methods We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 March 2011), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 3), MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2011), and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (31 March 2011). We handsearched citation lists of relevant publications, review articles, and included studies. Selection criteria Randomized controlled trials of tight versus very tight control in pregnant women with mild or moderate pre‐existing or non‐proteinuric gestational hypertension. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We expressed results as risk ratio (RR) or mean differences, together with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Main results We included two studies (256 participants) with mild‐moderate pre‐existing or non‐proteinuric gestational hypertension. There was no evidence of a difference between tight and very tight control groups regarding severe pre‐eclampsia (risk ratio (RR) 1.28, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.70; two trials, 256 participants). More women in the tight group were hospitalized during their pregnancy (RR 2.53, 95% CI 1.14 to 5.63; one trial, 125 participants). There was no evidence of a difference in other outcome measures including fetal distress, IUGR, neonatal admission to a NICU, perinatal deaths, induction of labor and cesarean delivery between the tight and the very tight control groups. Gestational age at delivery had a non‐significant mean difference (MD) of ‐0.15 weeks between the tight and very tight control groups (MD ‐0.15, 95% CI ‐1.52 to 1.21, random‐effects, T² = 0.75, I² = 77%; two trials, 256 participants). The MD in birthweight between the tight and the very tight control group was not significant (MD ‐100.00 grams, 95% CI ‐363.69 to 163.69; one trial, 125 participants). Authors' conclusions For pregnant women with non‐severe pre‐existing or non‐proteinuric gestational hypertension, there is insufficient evidence to determine how tight control of hypertension should be achieved to improve maternal and fetal‐neonatal outcomes.
ISSN:1465-1858
1465-1858
1469-493X
DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD006907.pub2