Money and capital
The effects of money (anticipated inflation) on capital formation is a classic issue in macroeconomics. Previous papers adopt reduced-form approaches, putting money in the utility function, or imposing cash in advance, but using otherwise frictionless models. We follow instead a literature that trie...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of monetary economics 2011-03, Vol.58 (2), p.98-116 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The effects of money (anticipated inflation) on capital formation is a classic issue in macroeconomics. Previous papers adopt reduced-form approaches, putting money in the utility function, or imposing cash in advance, but using otherwise frictionless models. We follow instead a literature that tries to be explicit about the frictions making money essential. This introduces new elements, including a two-sector structure with centralized and decentralized markets, stochastic trading opportunities, and bargaining. These elements matter quantitatively and numerical results differ from findings in the reduced-form literature. The analysis also reduces a gap between microfounded monetary economics and mainstream macro.
► Extend the model in
Lagos and Wright (2005) to have capital. ► Stochastic trading opportunities are critical for matching observation on velocity. ► Holdup problems involving investment and money demand are important. ► Monetary policy can have a bigger impact on investment than previously thought. ► Reduce the gap between micro-founded models of money and mainstream macro. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0304-3932 1873-1295 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2011.03.003 |