Comparison and evaluation of four commercial kits relative to an in-house immunofluorescence test for detection of antibodies against Legionella pneumophila
Four commercially available kits from (1) Focus Diagnostics, (2) SERION, (3) Zeus and (4) Vircell for detection of antibodies to Legionella pneumophila were evaluated with panels of sera from patients with proven Legionella infection ( n = 81) and/or other bacterial infections ( n = 75). An in-hou...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases 2008-02, Vol.27 (2), p.149-152 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Four commercially available kits from (1) Focus Diagnostics, (2) SERION, (3) Zeus and (4) Vircell for detection of antibodies to
Legionella pneumophila
were evaluated with panels of sera from patients with proven
Legionella
infection (
n
= 81) and/or other bacterial infections (
n
= 75). An in-house indirect
Legionella
immunofluorescence antibody test (IF test) was used as reference. All sera from the laboratory-proven
Legionella pneumophila
cases [culture, urinary antigen test and/or polymerase chain reaction] of
Legionella
infection were found to be positive by the in-house IF test. The relative sensitivity for Focus Diagnostics, SERION, Zeus and Vircell kits was 81.5, 76.5, 68.8 and 62.5%, respectively, and the false-positive rate was 16.0, 5.6, 29.0 and 2.7%, respectively. The in-house IF test had a false-positive rate of 4.0%. It was found that none of the four commercial kits were as sensitive and specific as the in-house IF test. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0934-9723 1435-4373 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10096-007-0410-5 |