The Use of DNA Sequencing (ITS and trnL-F), AFLP, and Fluorescent In situ Hybridization to Study Allopolyploid Miscanthus (Poaceae)

Two clones of Miscanthus, grown under the names M. xgiganteus and M. sacchariflorus, have been used in biomass trials in Europe, but neither the identity of these clones nor their origin has been established. DNA sequencing, amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and chromosome studies confi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of botany 2002-02, Vol.89 (2), p.279-286
Hauptverfasser: Hodkinson, Trevor R., Chase, Mark W., Takahashi, Chigusa, Leitch, Ilia J., Bennett, Michael D., Stephen A. Renvoize
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Two clones of Miscanthus, grown under the names M. xgiganteus and M. sacchariflorus, have been used in biomass trials in Europe, but neither the identity of these clones nor their origin has been established. DNA sequencing, amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and chromosome studies confirm that M. xgiganteus is an allotriploid (2n = 3x = 57) combining genomes from M. sinensis {2n = 2x = 38) and M. sacchariflorus (2n = 38 or 76). Two alleles of the internal transcribed spacer of 18S-25S nuclear ribosomal DNA (ITS) were discovered in polymerase chain reaction products of M. xgiganteus. Cloning of these revealed that one matched M. sinensis and the other M. sacchariflorus. Plastid trnL intron and trnL-F spacer sequences showed that the maternal lineage of M. xgiganteus was M. sacchariflorus. Fluorescent in situ hybridization. FISH, was used to investigate genome organization in Miscanthus but was unable to differentiate between the different parental genomes present in M. xgiganteus, indicating that two parental genomes are still extremely similar at the repetitive DNA level. This study is an example in which rDNA sequences and AFLP fingerprints permit identification of the parental genomes in a hybrid, but FISH methods, at the repetitive DNA level (including genomic in situ hybridization, GISH), were unable to do so because their sequences remain too similar.
ISSN:0002-9122
1537-2197
DOI:10.3732/ajb.89.2.279