Association of candy weight loss rate with whole saliva flow rates

Objective The association of candy weight loss rate (CWLR) with whole saliva flow rates (WSFRs) was analyzed. Study design The unstimulated whole saliva flow rate (UWSFR), stimulated whole saliva flow rate by the gum test (SWSFR-GT) and stimulated whole saliva flow rate by the Saxon test (SWSFR-ST)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 2011-07, Vol.112 (1), p.e10-e14
Hauptverfasser: Yamamoto, Kazuhiko, DDS, PhD, Matsusue, Yumiko, DDS, Komatsu, Yuko, DDS, Kurihara, Miyako, DDS, Nakagawa, Yosuke, DDS, Kirita, Tadaaki, DDS, DMSc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The association of candy weight loss rate (CWLR) with whole saliva flow rates (WSFRs) was analyzed. Study design The unstimulated whole saliva flow rate (UWSFR), stimulated whole saliva flow rate by the gum test (SWSFR-GT) and stimulated whole saliva flow rate by the Saxon test (SWSFR-ST) were measured in 300 healthy young adults. CWLR was measured by passively holding sugar candy between the tongue dorsum and hard palate. The degree of discomfort was evaluated by the visual analog scale. Results CWLR was significantly correlated with UWSFR, SWSFR-GT, and SWSFR-ST with Pearson's correlation coefficients of 0.1847 ( P = .0013), 0.2097 ( P = .0003), and 0.2332 ( P < .0001), respectively; however, these were much smaller than those of 0.6858 ( P < .0001) between UWSFR and SWSFR-GT, 0.5071 ( P < .0001) between UWSFR and SWSFR-ST, and 0.5424 ( P < .0001) between SWSFR-GT and SWSFR-ST. The degree of discomfort was significantly lower in the measurement of CWLR than in any WSFRs ( P < .0001). Conclusions CWLR cannot be used as an independent alternative to WSFRs, although it can be measured with less discomfort.
ISSN:1079-2104
1528-395X
DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.01.027