Active Surveillance of Small Renal Masses: Progression Patterns of Early Stage Kidney Cancer

Abstract Background Most early stage kidney cancers are renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), and most are diagnosed incidentally by imaging as small renal masses (SRMs). Indirect evidence suggests that most small RCCs grow slowly and rarely metastasize. Objective To determine the progression and growth rat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology 2011-07, Vol.60 (1), p.39-44
Hauptverfasser: Jewett, Michael A.S, Mattar, Kamal, Basiuk, Joan, Morash, Christopher G, Pautler, Stephen E, Siemens, D. Robert, Tanguay, Simon, Rendon, Ricardo A, Gleave, Martin E, Drachenberg, Darrel E, Chow, Raymond, Chung, Hannah, Chin, Joseph L, Fleshner, Neil E, Evans, Andrew J, Gallie, Brenda L, Haider, Masoom A, Kachura, John R, Kurban, Ghada, Fernandes, Kimberly, Finelli, Antonio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Most early stage kidney cancers are renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), and most are diagnosed incidentally by imaging as small renal masses (SRMs). Indirect evidence suggests that most small RCCs grow slowly and rarely metastasize. Objective To determine the progression and growth rates for newly diagnosed SRMs stratified by needle core biopsy pathology. Design, setting, and participants A multicenter prospective phase 2 clinical trial of active surveillance of 209 SRMs in 178 elderly and/or infirm patients was conducted from 2004 until 2009 with treatment delayed until progression. Intervention Patients underwent serial imaging and needle core biopsies. Measurements We measured rates of change in tumor diameter (growth measured by imaging) and progression to ≥4 cm, doubling of tumor volume, or metastasis with histology on biopsy. Results and limitations Local progression occurred in 25 patients (12%), plus 2 progressed with metastases (1.1%). Of the 178 subjects with 209 SRMs, 127 with 151 SRMs had > 12 mo of follow-up with two or more images, with a mean follow-up of 28 mo. Their tumor diameters increased by an average of 0.13 cm/yr. Needle core biopsy in 101 SRMs demonstrated that the presence of RCC did not significantly change growth rate. Limitations included no central review of imaging and pathology and a short follow-up. Conclusions This is the first SRM active surveillance study to correlate growth with histology prospectively. In the first 2 yr, the rate of local progression to higher stage is low, and metastases are rare. SRMs appear to grow very slowly, even if biopsy proven to be RCC. Many patients with SRMs can therefore be initially managed conservatively with serial imaging, avoiding the morbidity of surgical or ablative treatment.
ISSN:0302-2838
1873-7560
DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.030