Sexual Function in Women with Type 1 Diabetes Matched with a Control Group: Depressive and Psychosocial Aspects

Sexual dysfunction in women with diabetes, despite its important consequences to their quality of life, has been investigated only recently with conflicting results about its prevalence and association with complications and psychological factors. To assess the prevalence of the alteration of sexual...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of sexual medicine 2011-06, Vol.8 (6), p.1694-1700
Hauptverfasser: Tagliabue, Milena, Gottero, Cristina, Zuffranieri, Marco, Negro, Manuela, Carletto, Sara, Picci, Rocco L., Tomelini, Michela, Bertaina, Silvana, Pucci, Enrico, Trento, Marina, Ostacoli, Luca
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Sexual dysfunction in women with diabetes, despite its important consequences to their quality of life, has been investigated only recently with conflicting results about its prevalence and association with complications and psychological factors. To assess the prevalence of the alteration of sexual function and the influence of metabolic control and psychological factors on female sexuality. Seventy-seven adult Italian women with type 1 diabetes, matched with a control group (n=77), completed questionnaires evaluating sexual function (Female Sexual Function Index, FSFI), depressive symptoms (Self-Rating Depression Scale, SRDS), social and family support (Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support), and diabetes-related quality of life (Diabetes Quality of Life). Clinical and metabolic data were collected. Prevalence and magnitude of sexual dysfunction in terms of alteration of sexual functioning as measured by the FSFI scores. The prevalence of sexual dysfunction was similar in diabetes and control groups (33.8% vs. 39.0%, not significant), except for higher SRDS scores in the diabetes group (47.39±11.96 vs. 43.82±10.66; P=0.047). Diabetic patients with an alteration of sexual function showed a significantly higher SRDS score (53.58±14.11 vs. 44.24± 9.38, P=0.004). Depression symptoms and good glycemic control (A1C
ISSN:1743-6095
1743-6109
DOI:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02262.x