PM sub(2.5) measurements in wildfire smoke plumes from fire seasons 2005-2008 in the Northwestern United States
PM sub(2.5) surface concentrations were measured in smoke emitted by four wildfire events during fire seasons 2005-2008. These measurements fill a gap in the existing scientific PM sub(2.5) observation database by providing a targeted wildfire-specific observation dataset. Four deployments occurred...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of aerosol science 2011-03, Vol.42 (3), p.143-155 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | PM sub(2.5) surface concentrations were measured in smoke emitted by four wildfire events during fire seasons 2005-2008. These measurements fill a gap in the existing scientific PM sub(2.5) observation database by providing a targeted wildfire-specific observation dataset. Four deployments occurred during various fire types including a managed-for-fuel-treatment wildfire complex, a wildfire complex, and two regional fire events. The maximum 24-h averaged values for each case were: 94.5 mu g/m super(3) (2005), 425 mu g/m super(3) (2006), 118 mu g/m super(3) (2007), and 247 mu g/m super(3) (2008). While these values are high, the diurnal concentration median and first quartile values remain below 35 and 10 mu g/m super(3), respectively. For all cases, the hourly diurnal patterns exhibit peak concentrations in the mid-morning and low concentrations in the mid-afternoon. Correlations between daily area actively burning and observed PM sub(2.5) concentrations were significant for all cases and concentration patterns were found to be similar by geographic location rather than by type of fire (single vs. region-wide). Multiple co-located monitor types, the Environmental Proof Beta Attenuation Monitor, which measures PM sub(2.5) concentrations using a beta-beam aimed at particulates collected on filter tape, and the E-SAMPLER and DataRAM, which both use nephelometry to measure PM sub(2.5) concentrations, showed statistically good agreement. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-8502 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.09.001 |