Conclusions from a dynamic population model for tsetse: response to comments

The critique by Hargrove et al. (Popul Ecol, 2011 ) of our recently published paper on a tsetse population model (Barclay and Vreysen in Popul Ecol 53:89–110, 2011 ) has made some good points but has also misinterpreted the intent of some of our results as we presented them. Hargrove et al. rightly...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Population ecology 2011-04, Vol.53 (2), p.417-420
Hauptverfasser: Barclay, Hugh J., Vreysen, Marc J. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The critique by Hargrove et al. (Popul Ecol, 2011 ) of our recently published paper on a tsetse population model (Barclay and Vreysen in Popul Ecol 53:89–110, 2011 ) has made some good points but has also misinterpreted the intent of some of our results as we presented them. Hargrove et al. rightly say that there is a mismatch between the size of the unit cells in the model (1 ha) and the iteration rate of the model (every 5 days), yielding too low a dispersal rate to simulate reality. However, they have misconstrued several of our results that we presented as examples to imply that those results were a necessary condition for control of tsetse, especially using traps and targets.
ISSN:1438-3896
1438-390X
DOI:10.1007/s10144-010-0260-3