Conclusions from a dynamic population model for tsetse: response to comments
The critique by Hargrove et al. (Popul Ecol, 2011 ) of our recently published paper on a tsetse population model (Barclay and Vreysen in Popul Ecol 53:89–110, 2011 ) has made some good points but has also misinterpreted the intent of some of our results as we presented them. Hargrove et al. rightly...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Population ecology 2011-04, Vol.53 (2), p.417-420 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The critique by Hargrove et al. (Popul Ecol,
2011
) of our recently published paper on a tsetse population model (Barclay and Vreysen in Popul Ecol 53:89–110,
2011
) has made some good points but has also misinterpreted the intent of some of our results as we presented them. Hargrove et al. rightly say that there is a mismatch between the size of the unit cells in the model (1 ha) and the iteration rate of the model (every 5 days), yielding too low a dispersal rate to simulate reality. However, they have misconstrued several of our results that we presented as examples to imply that those results were a necessary condition for control of tsetse, especially using traps and targets. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1438-3896 1438-390X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10144-010-0260-3 |