Shared decision making in Australia in 2011

The paper describes the current position of shared decision making (SDM) within the Australian healthcare system. SDM POLICY IN AUSTRALIA: Support for SDM exists through guidelines and policy documents, and is strongly endorsed by consumer organisations; however, there is no clear overarching policy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 2011, Vol.105 (4), p.234-239
Hauptverfasser: McCaffery, Kirsten J, Smith, Sian, Shepherd, Heather L, Sze, Ming, Dhillon, Haryana, Jansen, Jesse, Juraskova, Ilona, Butow, Phyllis N, Trevena, Lyndal, Carey, Karen, Tattersall, Martin H N, Barratt, Alexandra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The paper describes the current position of shared decision making (SDM) within the Australian healthcare system. SDM POLICY IN AUSTRALIA: Support for SDM exists through guidelines and policy documents, and is strongly endorsed by consumer organisations; however, there is no clear overarching policy framework for SDM in Australia. TOOLS FOR SDM: There are limited tools available for SDM in clinical practice. Access to tools exists through some Australian health research and consumer organisation websites but the use of tools remains idiosyncratic. IMPLEMENTATION OF SDM: Comparatively little has been achieved in the implementation of SDM in Australia. Although there is wide recognition that consumer involvement in health decisions is important, provision of resources and infrastructure to achieve it is limited, and there is no clear strategy to support implementation within the healthcare system. SDM IN THE FUTURE: Current reforms to the healthcare system may enable a more centralised approach to implementation of SDM in the future. A new federally funded consumer health information organisation may assist by providing a central point through which SDM interventions may be made available to the Australian public and the Australian Charter of Rights has the potential to provide a national framework for consumer involvement. However, priority needs to be given to SDM by both federal and state governments with greater investment in SDM research and in activities to support implementation in clinical practice.
ISSN:1865-9217
DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.010