Grading of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma using late phase of contrast enhanced sonography—A prospective study

Abstract Background Outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma is influenced by their histological grade. Invasive biopsy of the lesions is the gold standard in this regard. Aims We therefore analysed the diagnostic accuracy of contrast enhanced ultrasound for non-invasive grading of hypervas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Digestive and liver disease 2011-06, Vol.43 (6), p.484-490
Hauptverfasser: Boozari, Bita, Soudah, Bisharah, Rifai, Kinan, Schneidewind, Sabine, Vogel, Arndt, Hecker, Hartmut, Hahn, Andreas, Schlue, Jerome, Dietrich, Christoph F, Bahr, Matthias J, Kubicka, Stefan, Manns, Michael P, Gebel, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma is influenced by their histological grade. Invasive biopsy of the lesions is the gold standard in this regard. Aims We therefore analysed the diagnostic accuracy of contrast enhanced ultrasound for non-invasive grading of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma in liver cirrhosis. Methods According to the tumour perfusion kinetics on contrast enhanced ultrasound two grading groups were prospectively defined: well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (US-G1) and higher grade hepatocellular carcinoma (US-G2/G3). Immediately after contrast enhanced ultrasound-grading, biopsies of hepatocellular carcinoma-lesions ( n = 95, 1.2–12.5 cm) were obtained and analysed for tumour grading (G). Descriptive statistics, sensitivity, specificity positive and negative predictive values, diagnostic likelihood ratios and interoperator reproducibility were calculated ( κ ). Results Histologically 77 (81.1%) patients had G2–G3 and 18 (18.9%) had G1 tumours. Higher grade hepatocellular carcinoma showed more often a washout in the portal or late phase ( p < 0.0001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values and negative predictive values of contrast enhanced ultrasound for grading of hepatocellular carcinoma for all patients were 94% (CI: 72–99%), 95% (CI: 88–99%), 81% and 99% and for patients with tumours < 5 cm 100%(95% CI: 79–100), 96% (95% CI: 80–99), 92% and 100%. Positive and negative diagnostic likelihood ratios’ were 18 and 26 and 0.06 and 0, respectively. κ = 0.941 ( p < 0.001). Conclusions Contrast enhanced ultrasound has a high diagnostic value and reproducibility for non-invasive grading of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma >1 cm in patients with liver cirrhosis.
ISSN:1590-8658
1878-3562
DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2011.01.001