Comparison of different anthropometric measures as predictors of diabetes incidence in a Chinese population

Abstract Objective We aimed to explore an optimal anthropometric indicator and optimal cut-off points for incident diabetes in Chinese adults. Methods 61,703 subjects were followed for a median duration of 2 years. Body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and waist-to-height ratio we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes research and clinical practice 2011-05, Vol.92 (2), p.265-271
Hauptverfasser: Jia, Zhaoxia, Zhou, Yong, Liu, Xiurong, Wang, Yilong, Zhao, Xingquan, Wang, Yongjun, Liang, Wannian, Wu, Shouling
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective We aimed to explore an optimal anthropometric indicator and optimal cut-off points for incident diabetes in Chinese adults. Methods 61,703 subjects were followed for a median duration of 2 years. Body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and waist-to-height ratio were collected base on a standard protocol. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analyses were used to compare the predictive power of baseline BMI, WC, WHpR and WHtR for development of type 2 diabetes. Results There were 2991 new cases of type 2 diabetes during follow-up. ROC curve analyses indicated that WHtR was the best predictor of type 2 diabetes for male (AUC = 0.633). For female, WHtR and WC had similar predictive ability (AUC = 0.701 and 0.695 respectively) and were superior to BMI. WHpR was the weakest predictor in both genders. The optimal WHtR cut-off values for incidence of type 2 diabetes were similar in both genders (0.53 vs. 0.52). BMI was higher in men (26 kg/m2 ) than women (24 kg/m2 ); and so did WC (91 cm in men vs. 85 cm in women). Conclusions WHtR, and to some degree WC, are the best predictors of type 2 diabetes, followed by BMI then WHpR which is the weakest predictor in the tested adults.
ISSN:0168-8227
1872-8227
DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2011.01.021