Anesthesiology residency program director burnout

Abstract Study Objective To evaluate work-related stress as well as personal factors associated with professional burnout in program directors of anesthesiology. Design Survey instrument. Setting Academic anesthesiology department. Subjects Anesthesiology residency program directors (n = 132). Measu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical anesthesia 2011-05, Vol.23 (3), p.176-182
Hauptverfasser: De Oliveira, Gildasio S., MD, Almeida, Marcela D., MD, Ahmad, Shireen, MD, Fitzgerald, Paul C., MS, RN, McCarthy, Robert J., PharmD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Study Objective To evaluate work-related stress as well as personal factors associated with professional burnout in program directors of anesthesiology. Design Survey instrument. Setting Academic anesthesiology department. Subjects Anesthesiology residency program directors (n = 132). Measurements A 5-part structured, open-ended questionnaire evaluating program and respondents' demographic information, work-related stressors, assessment of control of respondent's personal life using the modified efficiency scale, the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services survey (MBI-HSS), and assessment of spousal/significant relationship support. Main Results 100 program directors (76%) responded to the survey. Twenty respondents met the criteria for high burnout risk, and an additional 30 were at risk of developing burnout. Twenty-two directors reported the high likelihood that they would step down in one to two years. Forty-three percent who reported the high likelihood of stepping down stated they were significantly affected by job-related stressors compared with 18% who reported a lower likelihood of stepping down ( P = 0.03). Program directors who scored in the high burnout risk category were more likely to report lower current job satisfaction ( P < 0.005) and an increased likelihood of stepping down in the next two years ( P = 0.009). Logistic regression analysis identified compliance issues, self-assessment of effectiveness, family/significant other support, perceived impact of stressful factors, and current job satisfaction as predictors of high burnout. The model had a sensitivity (95% CI) of 0.55 (0.34 to 0.74) and specificity of 0.99 (0.92 to 1.0) for predicting high burnout risk. Conclusions Fifty-two percent of anesthesiology program directors are at high risk for developing burnout syndrome. Job-related stress, especially with administrative duties regarding compliance, was predictive of burnout among program directors.
ISSN:0952-8180
1873-4529
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.02.001