Genetics of type 2 diabetes: pathophysiologic and clinical relevance

Eur J Clin Invest 2011; 41 (6): 679–692 Background  Recent genome‐wide association studies enlarged our knowledge about the genetic background of type 2 diabetes. Aims  This review provides an overview of the role of these novel genetic findings for the pathophysiology, prediction and treatment of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of clinical investigation 2011-06, Vol.41 (6), p.679-692
Hauptverfasser: Herder, Christian, Roden, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Eur J Clin Invest 2011; 41 (6): 679–692 Background  Recent genome‐wide association studies enlarged our knowledge about the genetic background of type 2 diabetes. Aims  This review provides an overview of the role of these novel genetic findings for the pathophysiology, prediction and treatment of type 2 diabetes. Results  The genetic susceptibility to type 2 diabetes appears to be determined by many common variants in multiple gene loci with low effect sizes. Although at least 36 diabetes‐associated genes were identified, only about 10% of the heritability of type 2 diabetes can be explained. Most of the discovered gene variants have been linked to beta‐cell dysfunction rather than insulin resistance, which might challenge established thinking of type 2 diabetes as a predominant disorder of insulin action. Genetic data can lead to statistically significant, but not to clinically relevant contributions to risk prediction for type 2 diabetes. Nevertheless, preliminary evidence suggests interactions between genotypes and response to lifestyle changes or drug treatment. Conclusions  Future studies need to target the issue of hidden heritability and to detect the causal gene variants within the identified gene loci. Improved understanding of the genetic contribution to type 2 diabetes may then help addressing the questions whether genotyping is useful to predict individual diabetes risk, identifies individual responsiveness to preventive and therapeutic interventions or at least allows for breaking down type 2 diabetes into smaller, clinically meaningful subtypes.
ISSN:0014-2972
1365-2362
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02454.x