Twenty years of countermeasures against postoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections

Purpose A total of 7345 cases of digestive organ surgery were investigated over the course of 20 years. Methods Owing to the increasing incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, we classified our countermeasures into periods A (September 1987 to February 1990), B (M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan) Japan), 2011-05, Vol.41 (5), p.630-636
Hauptverfasser: Kusachi, Shinya, Nagao, Jiro, Saida, Yoshihisa, Watanabe, Manabu, Nakamura, Yoichi, Asai, Koji, Okamoto, Yasushi, Arima, Yoichi, Watanabe, Ryohei, Uramatsu, Masashi, Saito, Tomoaki, Kiribayashi, Takaharu, Sato, Junko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose A total of 7345 cases of digestive organ surgery were investigated over the course of 20 years. Methods Owing to the increasing incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, we classified our countermeasures into periods A (September 1987 to February 1990), B (March 1990 to February 1997), C (March 1997 to February 1999), D (March 1999 to October 2004), and E (November 2004 to August 2007), and compared the number of infections during these periods. In period B, cefazolin and cefotiam were administered as prophylaxes. The treatment continued for 4 days, including the day of surgery. The patients undergoing endotracheal intubation or tracheotomy were managed with nonscreening pre-emptive isolation and cohorting (NSPEI&C), regardless of whether MRSA was present. However, NSPEI&C was halted in period C, but it was thereafter implemented again, and prophylactic antibiotics were administered only on the day of surgery during period D. In period E, prophylactic antibiotics were administered for 3 days. Results In period A, MRSA was contracted in 4.1% (34/833) of patients. In period B, the MRSA isolation rate decreased to 0.3% (8/2722). In period C, the MRSA isolation rate increased to 3.4% (23/681). In period D, the MRSA isolation rate fell to 2.2% (40/1807). In period E, MRSA isolation cases significantly decreased to 0.4% (5/1302; P < 0.002 vs period D). Conclusion The comprehensive management, selection of prophylactic antibiotics, and NSPEI&C were all considered to be effective.
ISSN:0941-1291
1436-2813
DOI:10.1007/s00595-010-4342-9