A Comparison of the Thermal-Dose Equation and the Intensity-Time Product, It m, for Predicting Tissue Damage Thresholds
Thermal dose is the most generally accepted concept for estimating temperature-related tissue damage thresholds in high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) procedures. However, another approach based on the intensity-time product I t m = D has been used, where D is a tissue-dependent damage threshol...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ultrasound in medicine & biology 2011-04, Vol.37 (4), p.580-586 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Thermal dose is the most generally accepted concept for estimating temperature-related tissue damage thresholds in high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) procedures. However, another approach based on the intensity-time product
I t
m =
D has been used, where
D is a tissue-dependent damage threshold,
I is the spatial-peak, temporal-average intensity and
t is time. In this study, these two approaches were compared analytically by substituting a well-known soft-tissue solution for temperature vs. time into the thermal dose equation. From power law fits of
I vs.
t,
m was found to fall between about 0.3 and 0.8. In terms of the intensity required for cell death for a given exposure time, the standard deviation of the error between the full thermal-dose formulation and the
I t
m =
D prediction based upon the power-law fit was less than 5% for focal beam diameters up to 3 mm. Thus, for the practical range of HIFU parameters examined, the intensity-time product relationship is equivalent to the thermal dose formulation. (E-mail:
gerald.harris@fda.hhs.gov) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0301-5629 1879-291X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.01.005 |