Early Mobilization in Critically Ill Patients: Patients' Mobilization Level Depends on Health Care Provider's Profession

Objective To evaluate whether the level of mobilization achieved and the barriers for progressing to the next mobilization level differ between nurses and physical therapists. Design Prospective, observational study. Setting Twenty-bed surgical intensive care unit (SICU) of the Massachusetts General...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PM & R 2011-04, Vol.3 (4), p.307-313
Hauptverfasser: Garzon-Serrano, Jaime, MD, Ryan, Cheryl, RN, Waak, Karen, DPT, Hirschberg, Ronald, MD, Tully, Susan, RN, Bittner, Edward A., MD, PhD, Chipman, Daniel W., BS, RRT, Schmidt, Ulrich, MD, PhD, Kasotakis, Georgios, MD, Benjamin, John, MD, Zafonte, Ross, DO, Eikermann, Matthias, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To evaluate whether the level of mobilization achieved and the barriers for progressing to the next mobilization level differ between nurses and physical therapists. Design Prospective, observational study. Setting Twenty-bed surgical intensive care unit (SICU) of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Participants Sixty-three critically ill patients. Methods Physical therapists and nurses performed 179 mobilization therapies with 63 patients. Outcome Measurement Mobilization was defined as the process of enhancing mobility in the SICU, including bed mobility, edge of bed activities, transfers out of bed to a chair, and gait training; the mobilization level was measured on the SICU optimal mobilization scale, a 5-point (0-4) numerical rating scale. Results Patients' level of mobilization achieved by physical therapists was significantly higher compared with that achieved by nurses (2.3 ± 1.2 mean ± SD versus 1.2 ± 1.2, respectively P < .0001). Different barriers for mobilization were identified by physical therapists and nurses: hemodynamic instability (26% versus 12%, P = .03) and renal replacement therapy (12% versus 1%, P = .03) were barriers rated higher by nurses, whereas neurologic impairment was rated higher by physical therapists providers (18% versus 38%, P = .002). No mobilization-associated adverse events were observed in this study. Conclusions This study showed that physical therapists mobilize their critically ill patients to higher levels compared with nurses. Nurse and physical therapists identify different barriers for mobilization. Routine involvement of physical therapists in directing mobilization treatment may promote early mobilization of critically ill patients.
ISSN:1934-1482
1934-1563
DOI:10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.12.022