INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND COMMON LAW. A DISCUSSION OF THEORIES MULTICULTURALISM

This work AIMS to discuss the Various Approaches to common law and the legal treatment of indigenous peoples from the different theoretical perspectives that have given answers to treatment of Indigenous Peoples from the Different Theoretical Perspectives That Have Given answers to these questions. The guiding hypothesis is that there is a problematic node which hasn't been these questions. The Guiding hypothesis is That There is a problematic node Which hasn't Been resolved yet by hegemonic multicultural discourses. This node is the inclusion of cultural diverse- yet resolved by hegemonic multicultural discourses. This node is the inclusion of cultural diversity as the inclusion of a "real other" who embodies a way of life based on radically different ethnicity as the inclusion of a "real other" Who Embodied a way of life based on Radically Different ethic and moral conceptions relative to those which provided the foundations for the construction of Conceptions relative to moral and Those Which Provides the foundations for the construction of western States. This point can't be resolved neither by some radical legal relativism as stated by States. This western point Cannot Be Some radical resolved by legal Neither relativism as Stated by the most radical theories of legal anthropology. This work tries to find a common ground between The Most Radical Theories of legal anthropology. This work tries to find a common ground entre both poles in the theoretical debate, aiming to further the discussion on the subject. Both poles in the Theoretical debate, aiming to Further the discussion on the subject. Adapted from the source document.