Replacement behaviors for identified functions of challenging behaviors

▶ We reviewed treatments implemented for challenging behaviors. ▶ Functional assessment was used to determine treatments. ▶ Interventions included operant methods, skills building, and sensory treatments. ▶ Reinforcement procedures were the most common intervention strategies employed. Functional as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research in developmental disabilities 2011-03, Vol.32 (2), p.681-684
Hauptverfasser: Matson, Johnny L., Shoemaker, Mary E., Sipes, Megan, Horovitz, Max, Worley, Julie A., Kozlowski, Alison M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:▶ We reviewed treatments implemented for challenging behaviors. ▶ Functional assessment was used to determine treatments. ▶ Interventions included operant methods, skills building, and sensory treatments. ▶ Reinforcement procedures were the most common intervention strategies employed. Functional assessment has become a major feature of learning-based research. A critical element of the majority of these studies includes not only methods and procedures to identify the cause of the challenging behavior, but to establish replacement treatment methods. By far the most common intervention in the 176 studies we reviewed was reinforcement. Noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) was the most common reinforcement method, followed by differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO). Reinforcement plus extinction was the second most commonly employed treatment followed by functional communication training with or without reinforcement. Researchers proved to be very creative. Forty different treatment methods were employed. The implications of these data are discussed.
ISSN:0891-4222
1873-3379
DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.014