Effects of blood glucose level on FDG uptake by liver: a FDG-PET/CT study

Abstract In FDG-PET for abdominal malignancy, the liver may be assumed as an internal standard for grading abnormal FDG uptake both in early images and in delayed images. However, physiological variables of FDG uptake by the liver, especially the effects of blood glucose level, have not yet been elu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nuclear medicine and biology 2011-04, Vol.38 (3), p.347-351
Hauptverfasser: Kubota, Kazuo, Watanabe, Hiroshige, Murata, Yuji, Yukihiro, Masashi, Ito, Kimiteru, Morooka, Miyako, Minamimoto, Ryogo, Hori, Ai, Shibuya, Hitoshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract In FDG-PET for abdominal malignancy, the liver may be assumed as an internal standard for grading abnormal FDG uptake both in early images and in delayed images. However, physiological variables of FDG uptake by the liver, especially the effects of blood glucose level, have not yet been elucidated. Methods FDG-PET studies of 70 patients examined at 50 to 70 min after injection (60±10 min: early images) and of 68 patients examined at 80 to 100 min after injection (90±10 min: delayed images) were analyzed for liver FDG uptake. Patients having lesions in the liver, spleen and pancreas; patients having bulk tumor in other areas; and patients early after chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded; also, patients with blood glucose level over 125 mg/dl were excluded. Results Mean standardized uptake value (SUV) of the liver, blood glucose level and sex showed no significant differences between early images and delayed images. However, liver SUV in the delayed image showed a larger variation than that in the early image and showed significant correlation to blood glucose level. The partial correlation coefficient between liver SUV and blood glucose level in the delayed image with adjustment for sex and age was 0.73 ( P
ISSN:0969-8051
1872-9614
DOI:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.09.004