A comparison between neodymium doped alumina samples obtained by Pechini and sol–gel methods using thermo-stimulated luminescence and SEM

Neodymium doped and undoped aluminum oxide samples were obtained using two different techniques: Pechini and sol–gel. Fine grained powders were produced using both procedures, which were analyzed using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Thermo-Stimulated Luminescence (TSL). Results showed that n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of non-crystalline solids 2010-12, Vol.356 (52), p.2956-2959
Hauptverfasser: Bitencourt, J.F.S., Ventieri, A., Gonçalves, K.A., Pires, E.L., Mittani, J.C., Tatumi, S.H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Neodymium doped and undoped aluminum oxide samples were obtained using two different techniques: Pechini and sol–gel. Fine grained powders were produced using both procedures, which were analyzed using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Thermo-Stimulated Luminescence (TSL). Results showed that neodymium ions incorporation is responsible for the creation of two new TSL peaks (125 and 265 °C) and, also, for the enhancement of the intrinsic TSL peak at 190 °C. An explanation was proposed for these observations. SEM gave the dimensions of the clusters produced by each method, showing that those obtained by Pechini are smaller than the ones produced by sol–gel; it can also explain the higher emission supplied by the first one.
ISSN:0022-3093
1873-4812
DOI:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.03.047