Observed nocturnal gravity wave variances and zonal momentum flux in mid-latitude mesopause region over Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

Twenty-nine nights including 275h measurements of temperature, zonal and meridional winds, and zonal momentum flux in the mesopause region were made between September 2006 and April 2007 with the Colorado State University (CSU) sodium lidar at Fort Collins, CO (40.6N, 105W). Perturbations with perio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of atmospheric and solar-terrestrial physics 2011-03, Vol.73 (4), p.449-456
Hauptverfasser: Acott, Phil E., She, C.-Y., Krueger, David A., Yan, Z.-A., Yuan, Tao, Yue, Jia, Harrell, Sean
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Twenty-nine nights including 275h measurements of temperature, zonal and meridional winds, and zonal momentum flux in the mesopause region were made between September 2006 and April 2007 with the Colorado State University (CSU) sodium lidar at Fort Collins, CO (40.6N, 105W). Perturbations with periods between 6min and 4h in temperature and winds were calculated and compared to the recently reported observations by a similar lidar located at Starfire Optical Range (SOR), NM (35N, 107W), showing general agreement. The seasonal means of the observed zonal momentum flux of these wave perturbations were found to be 0.12±0.46m2s−2 for the equinoctial season and −0.69±0.42m2s−2 for the winter season. These results are compared to two such observations in mid-latitude mesosphere and lower thermosphere (MLT) in the literature, i.e., lidar observation at SOR and radar observation near Kyoto, Japan (35N, 106E). Both magnitudes and signs of the CSU lidar observations are consistent with those published. ► Mesopause region temperature, winds, and zonal momentum flux in Colorado (41N, 105W). ► Gravity wave perturbations (6min–4h) agree with those in New Mexico (35N, 107W). ► Flux seasonal variations agree with those in NM (35N, 107W) and Japan (35N, 136E). ► Agreement in all three mid-latitude MF observations will guide GCM/GW parameterization.
ISSN:1364-6826
1879-1824
DOI:10.1016/j.jastp.2010.10.016