Evaluation of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Nuclear Cardiology appropriateness criteria for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in an Asian tertiary cardiac center
Background Appropriate use criteria (AUC) for SPECT MPI have been published to address concern about the growth of cardiac imaging studies and the effective use of imaging, but there is no published data on its role outside the United States. Methods All consecutive patients referred to the MPI labo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of nuclear cardiology 2011-04, Vol.18 (2), p.324-330 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Appropriate use criteria (AUC) for SPECT MPI have been published to address concern about the growth of cardiac imaging studies and the effective use of imaging, but there is no published data on its role outside the United States.
Methods
All consecutive patients referred to the MPI laboratory of our center from February 16 to June 19, 2009 were prospectively studied. Patients’ medical records and stress data were collected and all imaging results were recorded. Based on AUC, MPI studies were classified into appropriate, inappropriate, uncertain, or unclassified. MPI studies were classified on the basis of their results into normal or abnormal scans.
Results
There were 1,623 patients (mean age 61 years ± 11, 61% males). Most common indications for SPECT were evaluation of ischemic equivalent for coronary artery disease (CAD), risk assessment post-revascularization, and preoperative evaluation for non-cardiac surgery. 10% of referrals were classified as inappropriate, 5% uncertain, and 3% unclassified. Women (48.4% vs 40.6% for men,
P
= .063) and asymptomatic patients (50.2% vs 14.3% for symptomatic,
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1071-3581 1532-6551 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12350-010-9317-0 |