Extraordinary stability of copper(I)-tetrathiomolybdate complexes: Possible implications for aquatic ecosystems

An extraordinary affinity of MoS 42− for Cu accounts for Mo‐induced Cu deficiency in ruminants (molybdenosis) and offers an approach to treating Wilson's disease in humans. Evidence of thiomolybdates in sulfidic natural waters, and possibly even as metastable traces in oxic natural waters, rais...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental toxicology and chemistry 2011-01, Vol.30 (1), p.97-102
Hauptverfasser: Helz, George R., Erickson, Britt E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:An extraordinary affinity of MoS 42− for Cu accounts for Mo‐induced Cu deficiency in ruminants (molybdenosis) and offers an approach to treating Wilson's disease in humans. Evidence of thiomolybdates in sulfidic natural waters, and possibly even as metastable traces in oxic natural waters, raises the question of how Cu–Mo affinity might affect Cu availability or toxicity in aquatic ecosystems. Stabilities of inorganic Cu–MoS 42− complexes are characterized and quantified here for the first time. Two remarkably stable CuI dissolved complexes are identified (T = 23°C ± 2°C): Cu2(HS)2MoS 42− and Cu2S2MoS 44−. In addition, the solubility constant for a precipitate (NH4CuMoS4) was measured. Under the extremely reducing conditions in rumen fluids, these complexes will greatly suppress Cu+ activity, supporting prior conclusions about the mechanism of molybdenosis. In sulfidic natural waters, they help to prevent complete Cu impoverishment, as might otherwise occur by sulfide mineral precipitation. On the other hand, the complexes discovered here are HS−‐dependent and could not be important in oxic natural waters (with HS− concentrations < 10−9 M) even if metastable, biogenic MoS 42− indeed were present as previously conjectured. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011;30:97–102. © 2010 SETAC
ISSN:0730-7268
1552-8618
1552-8618
DOI:10.1002/etc.379