Minilaparotomy hysterectomy: A worthwhile alternative

Aim:  To report the clinical merits and usefulness of minilaparotomy hysterectomy in comparison to the traditional abdominal approach. Material and Methods:  A comparative study to review perioperative and postoperative outcomes and complications was conducted in 98 patients undergoing abdominal hys...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research 2011-04, Vol.37 (4), p.305-312
Hauptverfasser: Mahendru, Rajiv, Malik, Savita, Mittal, Amit, Sekhon, Parneet K., Malik, Nishita, Anand Mahendru, Tina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim:  To report the clinical merits and usefulness of minilaparotomy hysterectomy in comparison to the traditional abdominal approach. Material and Methods:  A comparative study to review perioperative and postoperative outcomes and complications was conducted in 98 patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy through Pfannenstiel incision for benign gynecological disease or pre‐invasive pathology. Fifty of these patients (Group I) underwent hysterectomy by minilaparotomy approach (≤5 cm incision) and 48 patients (Group II) had standard/conventional methodology (>6 cm incision). Results:  Though there were no statistically significant differences between the patients' profile as well as the size and weight of the removed uterus in the two groups, the mean operating time was 41.3 min in Group I and 77.5 min in Group II (P 
ISSN:1341-8076
1447-0756
DOI:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01348.x