Revisiting Child Second Language Acquisition: Rejoinder to Commentaries
Meisel replies to a series of commentaries on his original paper in this issue of Zeitschrift fur Sprachwissenschaft in support of Robert Bley-Vroman's (1990 & to appear) fundamental difference hypothesis (FDH). The claims made there & the assumptions on which these claims are based are...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 2009-06, Vol.28 (1), p.107-120 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | Meisel replies to a series of commentaries on his original paper in this issue of Zeitschrift fur Sprachwissenschaft in support of Robert Bley-Vroman's (1990 & to appear) fundamental difference hypothesis (FDH). The claims made there & the assumptions on which these claims are based are summarized, and individual authors are addressed with clarifications or rebuttals to their comments & critiques. The commentators' suggestions for theoretical modifications or additions are accepted. Z. Dubiel |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0721-9067 1613-3706 |
| DOI: | 10.1515/ZFSW.2009.012 |