Differences or fundamental differences?

Commenting on Jurgen M. Meisel's paper in this issue of Zeitschrift fur Sprachwissenschaft in support of Robert Bley-Vroman's (1990 & to appear) fundamental difference hypothesis (FDH), it is argued that his claim that fundamental differences can be observed in the acquisition of morph...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 2009-06, Vol.28 (1), p.97-106
Hauptverfasser: Verhagen, Josje, Schimke, Sarah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Commenting on Jurgen M. Meisel's paper in this issue of Zeitschrift fur Sprachwissenschaft in support of Robert Bley-Vroman's (1990 & to appear) fundamental difference hypothesis (FDH), it is argued that his claim that fundamental differences can be observed in the acquisition of morphosyntax between first & second language, when the latter is learned after age four, is premature. A review of studies is conducted, focusing on research of the acquisition of verbal morphology & its relation to verb placement in negated sentences which, it is argued, is particularly well suited to detecting fundamental differences between acquisition processes in first & second language. It is demonstrated that child first & second language learning & adult second language learning are very similar processes in this domain, & the claim that there is a qualitative, fundamental change in the acquisition process around the age of four is unwarranted. Z. Dubiel
ISSN:0721-9067
1613-3706
DOI:10.1515/ZFSW.2009.011