Pragmatics of LF intervention effects: Japanese and Korean Wh-interrogatives
This paper presents a pragmatic account for what have come to be known as logical form (LF) intervention effects, based on a wide range of data from Japanese and Korean. Despite their appearance, these effects are not due to structural constraints operative at LF but rather to a less-than-perfect re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pragmatics 2007-09, Vol.39 (9), p.1570-1590 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper presents a pragmatic account for what have come to be known as logical form (LF) intervention effects, based on a wide range of data from Japanese and Korean. Despite their appearance, these effects are not due to structural constraints operative at LF but rather to a less-than-perfect realization of the information structure of interrogative sentences. The potential interveners, which seem to be a random collection of various expressions, are classified as Anti-Topic Items, since they cannot bear the topic marker -
wa/(n)un. Although the non-Wh material in a Wh-question must belong to old information, the interveners fail to be interpreted as background material because of their Anti-Topicality when they precede Wh-phrases. The cancellation of the intervention effects with scrambling is derived from the prosodic phrasing that scrambling creates. Moving a Wh-element over an intervener places the intervener in the position of post-focus reduction—a prosodically reduced portion of the sentence. With post-focus reduction, the intervener becomes a part of old information. It will be shown that the proposed analysis not only accounts for core cases of intervention effects, but also makes correct predictions concerning the matrix-subordinate contrast in intervention effects and the special status of negative polarity items (NPIs). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0378-2166 1879-1387 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.03.002 |