Assessment of nuchal translucency thickness and the fetal anatomy in the first trimester of pregnancy by two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography: a pilot study
Aim: To evaluate the use of three-dimensional ultrasonography (3D) as an alternative for examining fetal anatomy and nuchal translucency (NT) in the 1st trimester of pregnancy. Method: Prospective study of 199 low risk pregnant women undergoing 1st trimester ultrasound scan for fetal anomalies. The...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of perinatal medicine 2011-03, Vol.39 (2), p.185-193 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aim: To evaluate the use of three-dimensional ultrasonography (3D) as an alternative for examining fetal anatomy and nuchal translucency (NT) in the 1st trimester of pregnancy. Method: Prospective study of 199 low risk pregnant women undergoing 1st trimester ultrasound scan for fetal anomalies. The NT and fetal anatomy were evaluated by three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography after the standard two-dimensional (2D) examination. The gold standard in this study was the 2D ultrasonography. Results: In some of the evaluated parameters the 3D method approaches the conventional 2D results. These parameters are the crown-rump length (CRL), the skull – brain anatomy (93.5%), the spine (85.4%), the upper (88.4%) and lower limbs (87.9%) and the examination of the fetal abdomen (98.5%). Some of the anatomic parameters under evaluation revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of the 2D examination. During the 3D examination the nasal bone was identified in 62.1% of the cases, the stomach in 85.9%, and the urinary bladder in 57.3% of the cases. The NT was assessed accurately in half of the cases compared to 2D examination. Conclusion: The 3D ultrasound is insufficient for the detailed fetal anatomy examination during the 1st trimester of pregnancy. Nevertheless, the method might be improved in order to be considered as a screening method. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-5577 1619-3997 |
DOI: | 10.1515/jpm.2010.156 |