Object preposing in 15th century Drenthe
Contrary to the findings of Thomas F. Shannon (2003) that pronominal objects canonically precede full noun phrase (NP) subjects in 16th-century Dutch literary corpora, an analysis of texts of judicial verdicts from Drenthe, a province speaking a Northeastern Dutch dialect, reveals a significant decr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Linguistics in the Netherlands 2006-11, Vol.23 (1), p.174-185 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Contrary to the findings of Thomas F. Shannon (2003) that pronominal objects canonically precede full noun phrase (NP) subjects in 16th-century Dutch literary corpora, an analysis of texts of judicial verdicts from Drenthe, a province speaking a Northeastern Dutch dialect, reveals a significant decrease during the 15th century in the scrambling of objects over subjects. The data examined are taken from samples for each decade from 1399 to 1518 & consist of all subordinate clauses containing a subject & an internal argument & all main clauses that additionally have the first position filled by an adverbial or one internal argument of a ditransitive construction. This discrepancy between the present study & Shannon's may be due to early development towards subject NP + object pronoun order in the Drenthe dialect, to conservatism in the dialects studied by Shannon, to genre-specific variation, &/or to possible leveling out of dialect variation in Shannon's data. Tables, Graphs, References. J. Hitchcock |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0929-7332 1569-9919 |
DOI: | 10.1075/avt.23.18rib |