Clause boundaries in Old Hittite relative sentences

Hittite relative sentences typically take the form 'conjunction whichever slaves have run away, conjunction those we shall recover'. The first part ('conj...away') is known as the relative clause and the second ('conj...recover') as the resumptive clause. However, neith...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transactions of the Philological Society 2006-04, Vol.104 (1), p.17-83
1. Verfasser: Probert, Philomen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Hittite relative sentences typically take the form 'conjunction whichever slaves have run away, conjunction those we shall recover'. The first part ('conj...away') is known as the relative clause and the second ('conj...recover') as the resumptive clause. However, neither part is always introduced by a conjunction, and there is not always an explicit resumption ('those'). This paper argues that in Old Hittite, and with exceptions under two well-defined conditions, the resumption and the conjunction introducing the resumptive clause are strictly both present or both absent. The distinction between sentences with both and sentences with neither points to a structural distinction between adjoined and embedded relative clauses. After Old Hittite, it is no longer necessary for a resumptive clause to include either both resumption and conjunction or neither of these elements. The new possibilities suggest that the Old Hittite embedded relative clauses have been reanalysed as adjoined. Figures. Adapted from the source document
ISSN:0079-1636
1467-968X
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-968X.2006.00165.x