The Power of Language in Computer-Mediated Groups
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of “powerful” and “powerless” language on small computer-mediated groups. Subjects (n = 27) were placed into 1 of 3 conditions with 2 confederates and asked to communicate via computer in a decision-making context. In the first condition, both c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Management communication quarterly 1995-02, Vol.8 (3), p.289-322 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 322 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 289 |
container_title | Management communication quarterly |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Adkins, Mark Brashers, Dale E. |
description | The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of “powerful” and “powerless” language on small computer-mediated groups. Subjects (n = 27) were placed into 1 of 3 conditions with 2 confederates and asked to communicate via computer in a decision-making context. In the first condition, both confederates used powerful language, in the second both used powerless language, and in the third condition one confederate used powerful language and the other used powerless language. Our results lead us to two general conclusions. First, language style has a significant impact on impression formation in computer-mediated groups. Generally, the user of a powerful language style in a computer-mediated group is perceived as more credible, attractive, and persuasive than the user of a powerless language style. Second, contrasting language styles caused perceptions to be more extreme than if users shared a common language style. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0893318995008003002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85596154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ498781</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0893318995008003002</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1750860031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3582-d5c7804396dd8105c6974b4ba8b7349da02b44578c997792cf1e867cce461fb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gR4CgrfoTPb7KKVWpaKHeg6bzaamtN242yD-exMiIiI9zWGe953hIeQc4RpRyhtQmlJUWnMABUABsgMyQs6zVEitDsmoJ9IeOSYnMa4AMGOII4KLN5e8-A8XEl8lc7NdtmbpknqbTPymaXcupE-urM3Olcks-LaJp-SoMuvozr7nmLzeTReT-3T-PHuY3M5TS7nK0pJbqYBRLcpSIXArtGQFK4wqJGW6NJAVjHGprNZS6sxW6JSQ1jomsCqQjsnV0NsE_966uMs3dbRuvTZb59uYK861QM468PIPuPJt2Ha_5aiVEFJRtp-SHJTotPVH6UDZ4GMMrsqbUG9M-MwR8l51_o_qLnUxpFyo7U9i-si0kqovhWEdO7W_zu5p_AJFw4OD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1750860031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Power of Language in Computer-Mediated Groups</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Adkins, Mark ; Brashers, Dale E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adkins, Mark ; Brashers, Dale E.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of “powerful” and “powerless” language on small computer-mediated groups. Subjects (n = 27) were placed into 1 of 3 conditions with 2 confederates and asked to communicate via computer in a decision-making context. In the first condition, both confederates used powerful language, in the second both used powerless language, and in the third condition one confederate used powerful language and the other used powerless language. Our results lead us to two general conclusions. First, language style has a significant impact on impression formation in computer-mediated groups. Generally, the user of a powerful language style in a computer-mediated group is perceived as more credible, attractive, and persuasive than the user of a powerless language style. Second, contrasting language styles caused perceptions to be more extreme than if users shared a common language style.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-3189</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6798</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0893318995008003002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MCQUEK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Newbury Park, Calif: SAGE PERIODICALS PRESS</publisher><subject>Communication Research ; Computer Mediated Communication ; Decision Making ; Higher Education ; Impression Formation ; Language ; Language Styles ; Organizational Communication</subject><ispartof>Management communication quarterly, 1995-02, Vol.8 (3), p.289-322</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Feb 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3582-d5c7804396dd8105c6974b4ba8b7349da02b44578c997792cf1e867cce461fb13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3582-d5c7804396dd8105c6974b4ba8b7349da02b44578c997792cf1e867cce461fb13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0893318995008003002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0893318995008003002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27846,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ498781$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adkins, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brashers, Dale E.</creatorcontrib><title>The Power of Language in Computer-Mediated Groups</title><title>Management communication quarterly</title><description>The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of “powerful” and “powerless” language on small computer-mediated groups. Subjects (n = 27) were placed into 1 of 3 conditions with 2 confederates and asked to communicate via computer in a decision-making context. In the first condition, both confederates used powerful language, in the second both used powerless language, and in the third condition one confederate used powerful language and the other used powerless language. Our results lead us to two general conclusions. First, language style has a significant impact on impression formation in computer-mediated groups. Generally, the user of a powerful language style in a computer-mediated group is perceived as more credible, attractive, and persuasive than the user of a powerless language style. Second, contrasting language styles caused perceptions to be more extreme than if users shared a common language style.</description><subject>Communication Research</subject><subject>Computer Mediated Communication</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Impression Formation</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Styles</subject><subject>Organizational Communication</subject><issn>0893-3189</issn><issn>1552-6798</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gR4CgrfoTPb7KKVWpaKHeg6bzaamtN242yD-exMiIiI9zWGe953hIeQc4RpRyhtQmlJUWnMABUABsgMyQs6zVEitDsmoJ9IeOSYnMa4AMGOII4KLN5e8-A8XEl8lc7NdtmbpknqbTPymaXcupE-urM3Olcks-LaJp-SoMuvozr7nmLzeTReT-3T-PHuY3M5TS7nK0pJbqYBRLcpSIXArtGQFK4wqJGW6NJAVjHGprNZS6sxW6JSQ1jomsCqQjsnV0NsE_966uMs3dbRuvTZb59uYK861QM468PIPuPJt2Ha_5aiVEFJRtp-SHJTotPVH6UDZ4GMMrsqbUG9M-MwR8l51_o_qLnUxpFyo7U9i-si0kqovhWEdO7W_zu5p_AJFw4OD</recordid><startdate>199502</startdate><enddate>199502</enddate><creator>Adkins, Mark</creator><creator>Brashers, Dale E.</creator><general>SAGE PERIODICALS PRESS</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SPJJO</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199502</creationdate><title>The Power of Language in Computer-Mediated Groups</title><author>Adkins, Mark ; Brashers, Dale E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3582-d5c7804396dd8105c6974b4ba8b7349da02b44578c997792cf1e867cce461fb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Communication Research</topic><topic>Computer Mediated Communication</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Impression Formation</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Styles</topic><topic>Organizational Communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adkins, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brashers, Dale E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 48</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Management communication quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adkins, Mark</au><au>Brashers, Dale E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ498781</ericid><atitle>The Power of Language in Computer-Mediated Groups</atitle><jtitle>Management communication quarterly</jtitle><date>1995-02</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>322</epage><pages>289-322</pages><issn>0893-3189</issn><eissn>1552-6798</eissn><coden>MCQUEK</coden><abstract>The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of “powerful” and “powerless” language on small computer-mediated groups. Subjects (n = 27) were placed into 1 of 3 conditions with 2 confederates and asked to communicate via computer in a decision-making context. In the first condition, both confederates used powerful language, in the second both used powerless language, and in the third condition one confederate used powerful language and the other used powerless language. Our results lead us to two general conclusions. First, language style has a significant impact on impression formation in computer-mediated groups. Generally, the user of a powerful language style in a computer-mediated group is perceived as more credible, attractive, and persuasive than the user of a powerless language style. Second, contrasting language styles caused perceptions to be more extreme than if users shared a common language style.</abstract><cop>Newbury Park, Calif</cop><pub>SAGE PERIODICALS PRESS</pub><doi>10.1177/0893318995008003002</doi><tpages>34</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0893-3189 |
ispartof | Management communication quarterly, 1995-02, Vol.8 (3), p.289-322 |
issn | 0893-3189 1552-6798 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85596154 |
source | SAGE Complete; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Communication Research Computer Mediated Communication Decision Making Higher Education Impression Formation Language Language Styles Organizational Communication |
title | The Power of Language in Computer-Mediated Groups |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T19%3A15%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Power%20of%20Language%20in%20Computer-Mediated%20Groups&rft.jtitle=Management%20communication%20quarterly&rft.au=Adkins,%20Mark&rft.date=1995-02&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=322&rft.pages=289-322&rft.issn=0893-3189&rft.eissn=1552-6798&rft.coden=MCQUEK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0893318995008003002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1750860031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1750860031&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ498781&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0893318995008003002&rfr_iscdi=true |