The Power of Language in Computer-Mediated Groups

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of “powerful” and “powerless” language on small computer-mediated groups. Subjects (n = 27) were placed into 1 of 3 conditions with 2 confederates and asked to communicate via computer in a decision-making context. In the first condition, both c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Management communication quarterly 1995-02, Vol.8 (3), p.289-322
Hauptverfasser: Adkins, Mark, Brashers, Dale E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 322
container_issue 3
container_start_page 289
container_title Management communication quarterly
container_volume 8
creator Adkins, Mark
Brashers, Dale E.
description The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of “powerful” and “powerless” language on small computer-mediated groups. Subjects (n = 27) were placed into 1 of 3 conditions with 2 confederates and asked to communicate via computer in a decision-making context. In the first condition, both confederates used powerful language, in the second both used powerless language, and in the third condition one confederate used powerful language and the other used powerless language. Our results lead us to two general conclusions. First, language style has a significant impact on impression formation in computer-mediated groups. Generally, the user of a powerful language style in a computer-mediated group is perceived as more credible, attractive, and persuasive than the user of a powerless language style. Second, contrasting language styles caused perceptions to be more extreme than if users shared a common language style.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0893318995008003002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85596154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ498781</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0893318995008003002</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1750860031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3582-d5c7804396dd8105c6974b4ba8b7349da02b44578c997792cf1e867cce461fb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gR4CgrfoTPb7KKVWpaKHeg6bzaamtN242yD-exMiIiI9zWGe953hIeQc4RpRyhtQmlJUWnMABUABsgMyQs6zVEitDsmoJ9IeOSYnMa4AMGOII4KLN5e8-A8XEl8lc7NdtmbpknqbTPymaXcupE-urM3Olcks-LaJp-SoMuvozr7nmLzeTReT-3T-PHuY3M5TS7nK0pJbqYBRLcpSIXArtGQFK4wqJGW6NJAVjHGprNZS6sxW6JSQ1jomsCqQjsnV0NsE_966uMs3dbRuvTZb59uYK861QM468PIPuPJt2Ha_5aiVEFJRtp-SHJTotPVH6UDZ4GMMrsqbUG9M-MwR8l51_o_qLnUxpFyo7U9i-si0kqovhWEdO7W_zu5p_AJFw4OD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1750860031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Power of Language in Computer-Mediated Groups</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Adkins, Mark ; Brashers, Dale E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adkins, Mark ; Brashers, Dale E.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of “powerful” and “powerless” language on small computer-mediated groups. Subjects (n = 27) were placed into 1 of 3 conditions with 2 confederates and asked to communicate via computer in a decision-making context. In the first condition, both confederates used powerful language, in the second both used powerless language, and in the third condition one confederate used powerful language and the other used powerless language. Our results lead us to two general conclusions. First, language style has a significant impact on impression formation in computer-mediated groups. Generally, the user of a powerful language style in a computer-mediated group is perceived as more credible, attractive, and persuasive than the user of a powerless language style. Second, contrasting language styles caused perceptions to be more extreme than if users shared a common language style.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-3189</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6798</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0893318995008003002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MCQUEK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Newbury Park, Calif: SAGE PERIODICALS PRESS</publisher><subject>Communication Research ; Computer Mediated Communication ; Decision Making ; Higher Education ; Impression Formation ; Language ; Language Styles ; Organizational Communication</subject><ispartof>Management communication quarterly, 1995-02, Vol.8 (3), p.289-322</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Feb 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3582-d5c7804396dd8105c6974b4ba8b7349da02b44578c997792cf1e867cce461fb13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3582-d5c7804396dd8105c6974b4ba8b7349da02b44578c997792cf1e867cce461fb13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0893318995008003002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0893318995008003002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27846,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ498781$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adkins, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brashers, Dale E.</creatorcontrib><title>The Power of Language in Computer-Mediated Groups</title><title>Management communication quarterly</title><description>The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of “powerful” and “powerless” language on small computer-mediated groups. Subjects (n = 27) were placed into 1 of 3 conditions with 2 confederates and asked to communicate via computer in a decision-making context. In the first condition, both confederates used powerful language, in the second both used powerless language, and in the third condition one confederate used powerful language and the other used powerless language. Our results lead us to two general conclusions. First, language style has a significant impact on impression formation in computer-mediated groups. Generally, the user of a powerful language style in a computer-mediated group is perceived as more credible, attractive, and persuasive than the user of a powerless language style. Second, contrasting language styles caused perceptions to be more extreme than if users shared a common language style.</description><subject>Communication Research</subject><subject>Computer Mediated Communication</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Impression Formation</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Styles</subject><subject>Organizational Communication</subject><issn>0893-3189</issn><issn>1552-6798</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gR4CgrfoTPb7KKVWpaKHeg6bzaamtN242yD-exMiIiI9zWGe953hIeQc4RpRyhtQmlJUWnMABUABsgMyQs6zVEitDsmoJ9IeOSYnMa4AMGOII4KLN5e8-A8XEl8lc7NdtmbpknqbTPymaXcupE-urM3Olcks-LaJp-SoMuvozr7nmLzeTReT-3T-PHuY3M5TS7nK0pJbqYBRLcpSIXArtGQFK4wqJGW6NJAVjHGprNZS6sxW6JSQ1jomsCqQjsnV0NsE_966uMs3dbRuvTZb59uYK861QM468PIPuPJt2Ha_5aiVEFJRtp-SHJTotPVH6UDZ4GMMrsqbUG9M-MwR8l51_o_qLnUxpFyo7U9i-si0kqovhWEdO7W_zu5p_AJFw4OD</recordid><startdate>199502</startdate><enddate>199502</enddate><creator>Adkins, Mark</creator><creator>Brashers, Dale E.</creator><general>SAGE PERIODICALS PRESS</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SPJJO</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199502</creationdate><title>The Power of Language in Computer-Mediated Groups</title><author>Adkins, Mark ; Brashers, Dale E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3582-d5c7804396dd8105c6974b4ba8b7349da02b44578c997792cf1e867cce461fb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Communication Research</topic><topic>Computer Mediated Communication</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Impression Formation</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Styles</topic><topic>Organizational Communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adkins, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brashers, Dale E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 48</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Management communication quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adkins, Mark</au><au>Brashers, Dale E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ498781</ericid><atitle>The Power of Language in Computer-Mediated Groups</atitle><jtitle>Management communication quarterly</jtitle><date>1995-02</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>322</epage><pages>289-322</pages><issn>0893-3189</issn><eissn>1552-6798</eissn><coden>MCQUEK</coden><abstract>The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of “powerful” and “powerless” language on small computer-mediated groups. Subjects (n = 27) were placed into 1 of 3 conditions with 2 confederates and asked to communicate via computer in a decision-making context. In the first condition, both confederates used powerful language, in the second both used powerless language, and in the third condition one confederate used powerful language and the other used powerless language. Our results lead us to two general conclusions. First, language style has a significant impact on impression formation in computer-mediated groups. Generally, the user of a powerful language style in a computer-mediated group is perceived as more credible, attractive, and persuasive than the user of a powerless language style. Second, contrasting language styles caused perceptions to be more extreme than if users shared a common language style.</abstract><cop>Newbury Park, Calif</cop><pub>SAGE PERIODICALS PRESS</pub><doi>10.1177/0893318995008003002</doi><tpages>34</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0893-3189
ispartof Management communication quarterly, 1995-02, Vol.8 (3), p.289-322
issn 0893-3189
1552-6798
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85596154
source SAGE Complete; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Communication Research
Computer Mediated Communication
Decision Making
Higher Education
Impression Formation
Language
Language Styles
Organizational Communication
title The Power of Language in Computer-Mediated Groups
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T19%3A15%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Power%20of%20Language%20in%20Computer-Mediated%20Groups&rft.jtitle=Management%20communication%20quarterly&rft.au=Adkins,%20Mark&rft.date=1995-02&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=322&rft.pages=289-322&rft.issn=0893-3189&rft.eissn=1552-6798&rft.coden=MCQUEK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0893318995008003002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1750860031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1750860031&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ498781&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0893318995008003002&rfr_iscdi=true