Efficacy and Safety of Radiotherapy in Acromegaly
Background and Aims Transsphenoidal surgery remains the treatment of choice in acromegaly, yet 40–50% of patients require secondary forms of therapy such as radiation therapy (RT) and somatostatin analogues (SA). We undertook this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RT in acromegaly. Method...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of medical research 2011, Vol.42 (1), p.48-52 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background and Aims Transsphenoidal surgery remains the treatment of choice in acromegaly, yet 40–50% of patients require secondary forms of therapy such as radiation therapy (RT) and somatostatin analogues (SA). We undertook this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RT in acromegaly. Methods Forty patients with acromegaly treated with RT (mean dose, 52 Gy) after failed pituitary surgery between 1993 and 2007 were analyzed; all were clinically and biochemically active. Patients were evaluated with yearly hormonal measurements [basal and glucose-suppressed growth hormone (GH), IGF-1, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free T4, cortisol, luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone or estradiol and prolactin (PRL)] and with magnetic resonance imaging every 2 years. Results Mean age of patients was 52.9 ± 12.1 years and 85% were female. All subjects had been followed for 1 year, 75% for 3 years, 70% for 5 years and 35% for 10 years. The median basal GH level fell from a baseline of 8.8 ng/mL to 2.27 ng/mL at 5 years ( p = 0.001) and to 1.88 ng/mL at 10 years ( p = 0.001). A GH |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0188-4409 1873-5487 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.arcmed.2011.01.004 |