The Morphosemantics of Warlpiri Counterfactual Conditionals

An analysis of counterfactuals in Warlpiri, an Australian language that does not use its past tense morphology to express counterfactuals, is argued to support Sabine Iatridou's (2000) morphosemantic analysis of counterfactuality, which analyzes the English past tense marker as an underspecifie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Linguistic inquiry 2003, Vol.34 (1), p.155-162
1. Verfasser: Legate, Julie Anne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:An analysis of counterfactuals in Warlpiri, an Australian language that does not use its past tense morphology to express counterfactuals, is argued to support Sabine Iatridou's (2000) morphosemantic analysis of counterfactuality, which analyzes the English past tense marker as an underspecified morpheme bearing an exclusion feature that either excludes the time of utterance from the topic time or the worlds of the speaker from the topic world. As the allomorph lpa of the Warlpiri imperfective morpheme is found both in the environment of past tense & in that of present counterfactual & future less vivid conditionals, where it is uninterpreted, it is concluded that Iatridou's exclusion feature is the conditioning factor for lpa. Past counterfactuals in Warlpiri are constrained by the absence of morphology that can mark the exclusion feature twice, as seen in the English past perfect. 8 References. J. Hitchcock
ISSN:0024-3892
1530-9150
DOI:10.1162/ling.2003.34.1.155