Measuring vocabulary size in English as an additional language

The paper reports findings from a study in two stages to trial tests of vocabulary size in English as an additional language (EAL). The first, pilot, stage trialled the Levels test (Nation, 1990) and the Yes/No test (Meara, 1992) with secondary students aged 15 years, with an average of 11 years of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Language teaching research : LTR 2002-04, Vol.6 (2), p.145-173
1. Verfasser: Cameron, Lynne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 173
container_issue 2
container_start_page 145
container_title Language teaching research : LTR
container_volume 6
creator Cameron, Lynne
description The paper reports findings from a study in two stages to trial tests of vocabulary size in English as an additional language (EAL). The first, pilot, stage trialled the Levels test (Nation, 1990) and the Yes/No test (Meara, 1992) with secondary students aged 15 years, with an average of 11 years of education in the target language. The Levels test was found more useful, mainly because the inclusion of non-words in the Yes/No test produced unreliable results. In the second stage, the Levels test was used with students aged 13 and 14 years, 63 students for whom English was an additional language, and 84 monolingual English speakers. The results of the tests show a different profile of scores for EAL than occur in typical EFL contexts. EAL students, who have had on average 10.5 years in English medium education, show gaps in their knowledge of the most frequent words and more serious problems with less frequent words, with important implications for educational achievement. Comparison of mean scores of EAL students and their native speaker peers using t-tests reveal significant differences at 3K and 5K levels. The study shows that the Levels test offers a useful research and pedagogic tool in additional language learning contexts, yielding an overall picture of receptive vocabulary learning across groups. The test also produces information about individual language development that may help teaching. Implications include the need for further research into the effects of learning environments on language development, andvthe need for skilled intervention in additional language development to continue throughout secondary schooling.
doi_str_mv 10.1191/1362168802lr103oa
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85555334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ647306</ericid><sage_id>10.1191_1362168802lr103oa</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2778898437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-6beaf8f525e539ab3dd21c5c48ba6a254a1caabc497dd98c1bd5ef57a4d113b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gOBhUfSWupPdTTYXQUr9R8WLnsNks6lb0qTuNoJ-erekWFA6lxl4v5l5PEJOgY0AMrgGnsSQKMXi2gHjLe6RAYg0jVgmxX6Ygx6tgUNy5P2cMcYl4wNy82zQd842M_rZaiy6Gt0X9fbbUNvQSTOrrX-n6Ck2FMvSrmzbYE1rbGYdzswxOaiw9uZk04fk7W7yOn6Ipi_3j-PbaaQ5T1ZRUhisVCVjaSTPsOBlGYOWWqgCE4ylQNCIhRZZWpaZ0lCU0lQyRVEC8ELxIbnq7y5d-9EZv8oX1mtTBx-m7XyuZCjORQAv_oDztnPBss_jNFUqU4KngTrfScWggGVi_RN6SLvWe2eqfOnsIsSTA8vXoef_Qg87l5vD6DXWlcNGW79d5Eki0uB0SM56zjirf-XJU1A5S4I86mUfMt562_33B4gJmKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221810948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring vocabulary size in English as an additional language</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Cameron, Lynne</creator><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Lynne</creatorcontrib><description>The paper reports findings from a study in two stages to trial tests of vocabulary size in English as an additional language (EAL). The first, pilot, stage trialled the Levels test (Nation, 1990) and the Yes/No test (Meara, 1992) with secondary students aged 15 years, with an average of 11 years of education in the target language. The Levels test was found more useful, mainly because the inclusion of non-words in the Yes/No test produced unreliable results. In the second stage, the Levels test was used with students aged 13 and 14 years, 63 students for whom English was an additional language, and 84 monolingual English speakers. The results of the tests show a different profile of scores for EAL than occur in typical EFL contexts. EAL students, who have had on average 10.5 years in English medium education, show gaps in their knowledge of the most frequent words and more serious problems with less frequent words, with important implications for educational achievement. Comparison of mean scores of EAL students and their native speaker peers using t-tests reveal significant differences at 3K and 5K levels. The study shows that the Levels test offers a useful research and pedagogic tool in additional language learning contexts, yielding an overall picture of receptive vocabulary learning across groups. The test also produces information about individual language development that may help teaching. Implications include the need for further research into the effects of learning environments on language development, andvthe need for skilled intervention in additional language development to continue throughout secondary schooling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1362-1688</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1191/1362168802lr103oa</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LTREFI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Achievement tests ; Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods ; Educational sciences ; English (Second Language) ; English as a second language instruction ; Language ; Language Acquisition ; Language Research ; Language Tests ; Learning environment ; Learning outcomes ; Modern language ; Monolingualism ; Native Speakers ; Receptive language ; Scores ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Second language vocabulary learning ; Secondary school students ; Secondary schools ; Students ; Teaching methods ; Testing ; Vocabulary ; Vocabulary Development ; Vocabulary size</subject><ispartof>Language teaching research : LTR, 2002-04, Vol.6 (2), p.145-173</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Arnold 2002</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Apr 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-6beaf8f525e539ab3dd21c5c48ba6a254a1caabc497dd98c1bd5ef57a4d113b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-6beaf8f525e539ab3dd21c5c48ba6a254a1caabc497dd98c1bd5ef57a4d113b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1191/1362168802lr103oa$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1191/1362168802lr103oa$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ647306$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13664755$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Lynne</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring vocabulary size in English as an additional language</title><title>Language teaching research : LTR</title><description>The paper reports findings from a study in two stages to trial tests of vocabulary size in English as an additional language (EAL). The first, pilot, stage trialled the Levels test (Nation, 1990) and the Yes/No test (Meara, 1992) with secondary students aged 15 years, with an average of 11 years of education in the target language. The Levels test was found more useful, mainly because the inclusion of non-words in the Yes/No test produced unreliable results. In the second stage, the Levels test was used with students aged 13 and 14 years, 63 students for whom English was an additional language, and 84 monolingual English speakers. The results of the tests show a different profile of scores for EAL than occur in typical EFL contexts. EAL students, who have had on average 10.5 years in English medium education, show gaps in their knowledge of the most frequent words and more serious problems with less frequent words, with important implications for educational achievement. Comparison of mean scores of EAL students and their native speaker peers using t-tests reveal significant differences at 3K and 5K levels. The study shows that the Levels test offers a useful research and pedagogic tool in additional language learning contexts, yielding an overall picture of receptive vocabulary learning across groups. The test also produces information about individual language development that may help teaching. Implications include the need for further research into the effects of learning environments on language development, andvthe need for skilled intervention in additional language development to continue throughout secondary schooling.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Achievement tests</subject><subject>Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English as a second language instruction</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Language Research</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Learning environment</subject><subject>Learning outcomes</subject><subject>Modern language</subject><subject>Monolingualism</subject><subject>Native Speakers</subject><subject>Receptive language</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Second language vocabulary learning</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Vocabulary Development</subject><subject>Vocabulary size</subject><issn>1362-1688</issn><issn>1477-0954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gOBhUfSWupPdTTYXQUr9R8WLnsNks6lb0qTuNoJ-erekWFA6lxl4v5l5PEJOgY0AMrgGnsSQKMXi2gHjLe6RAYg0jVgmxX6Ygx6tgUNy5P2cMcYl4wNy82zQd842M_rZaiy6Gt0X9fbbUNvQSTOrrX-n6Ck2FMvSrmzbYE1rbGYdzswxOaiw9uZk04fk7W7yOn6Ipi_3j-PbaaQ5T1ZRUhisVCVjaSTPsOBlGYOWWqgCE4ylQNCIhRZZWpaZ0lCU0lQyRVEC8ELxIbnq7y5d-9EZv8oX1mtTBx-m7XyuZCjORQAv_oDztnPBss_jNFUqU4KngTrfScWggGVi_RN6SLvWe2eqfOnsIsSTA8vXoef_Qg87l5vD6DXWlcNGW79d5Eki0uB0SM56zjirf-XJU1A5S4I86mUfMt562_33B4gJmKw</recordid><startdate>200204</startdate><enddate>200204</enddate><creator>Cameron, Lynne</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Turpin</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200204</creationdate><title>Measuring vocabulary size in English as an additional language</title><author>Cameron, Lynne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-6beaf8f525e539ab3dd21c5c48ba6a254a1caabc497dd98c1bd5ef57a4d113b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Achievement tests</topic><topic>Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English as a second language instruction</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Language Research</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Learning environment</topic><topic>Learning outcomes</topic><topic>Modern language</topic><topic>Monolingualism</topic><topic>Native Speakers</topic><topic>Receptive language</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Second language vocabulary learning</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Vocabulary Development</topic><topic>Vocabulary size</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Lynne</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Language teaching research : LTR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cameron, Lynne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ647306</ericid><atitle>Measuring vocabulary size in English as an additional language</atitle><jtitle>Language teaching research : LTR</jtitle><date>2002-04</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>145</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>145-173</pages><issn>1362-1688</issn><eissn>1477-0954</eissn><coden>LTREFI</coden><abstract>The paper reports findings from a study in two stages to trial tests of vocabulary size in English as an additional language (EAL). The first, pilot, stage trialled the Levels test (Nation, 1990) and the Yes/No test (Meara, 1992) with secondary students aged 15 years, with an average of 11 years of education in the target language. The Levels test was found more useful, mainly because the inclusion of non-words in the Yes/No test produced unreliable results. In the second stage, the Levels test was used with students aged 13 and 14 years, 63 students for whom English was an additional language, and 84 monolingual English speakers. The results of the tests show a different profile of scores for EAL than occur in typical EFL contexts. EAL students, who have had on average 10.5 years in English medium education, show gaps in their knowledge of the most frequent words and more serious problems with less frequent words, with important implications for educational achievement. Comparison of mean scores of EAL students and their native speaker peers using t-tests reveal significant differences at 3K and 5K levels. The study shows that the Levels test offers a useful research and pedagogic tool in additional language learning contexts, yielding an overall picture of receptive vocabulary learning across groups. The test also produces information about individual language development that may help teaching. Implications include the need for further research into the effects of learning environments on language development, andvthe need for skilled intervention in additional language development to continue throughout secondary schooling.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1191/1362168802lr103oa</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1362-1688
ispartof Language teaching research : LTR, 2002-04, Vol.6 (2), p.145-173
issn 1362-1688
1477-0954
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85555334
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Academic achievement
Achievement tests
Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods
Educational sciences
English (Second Language)
English as a second language instruction
Language
Language Acquisition
Language Research
Language Tests
Learning environment
Learning outcomes
Modern language
Monolingualism
Native Speakers
Receptive language
Scores
Second Language Instruction
Second Language Learning
Second language vocabulary learning
Secondary school students
Secondary schools
Students
Teaching methods
Testing
Vocabulary
Vocabulary Development
Vocabulary size
title Measuring vocabulary size in English as an additional language
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T13%3A04%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20vocabulary%20size%20in%20English%20as%20an%20additional%20language&rft.jtitle=Language%20teaching%20research%20:%20LTR&rft.au=Cameron,%20Lynne&rft.date=2002-04&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=145-173&rft.issn=1362-1688&rft.eissn=1477-0954&rft.coden=LTREFI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1191/1362168802lr103oa&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2778898437%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221810948&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ647306&rft_sage_id=10.1191_1362168802lr103oa&rfr_iscdi=true