Measuring vocabulary size in English as an additional language
The paper reports findings from a study in two stages to trial tests of vocabulary size in English as an additional language (EAL). The first, pilot, stage trialled the Levels test (Nation, 1990) and the Yes/No test (Meara, 1992) with secondary students aged 15 years, with an average of 11 years of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Language teaching research : LTR 2002-04, Vol.6 (2), p.145-173 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The paper reports findings from a study in two stages to trial tests of vocabulary
size in English as an additional language (EAL). The first, pilot, stage trialled
the Levels test (Nation, 1990) and the Yes/No test (Meara, 1992) with secondary
students aged 15 years, with an average of 11 years of education in the target
language. The Levels test was found more useful, mainly because the inclusion of
non-words in the Yes/No test produced unreliable results.
In the second stage, the Levels test was used with students aged 13 and 14 years, 63
students for whom English was an additional language, and 84 monolingual English
speakers. The results of the tests show a different profile of scores for EAL than
occur in typical EFL contexts. EAL students, who have had on average 10.5 years in
English medium education, show gaps in their knowledge of the most frequent words
and more serious problems with less frequent words, with important implications for
educational achievement. Comparison of mean scores of EAL students and their native
speaker peers using t-tests reveal significant differences at 3K and 5K levels.
The study shows that the Levels test offers a useful research and pedagogic tool in
additional language learning contexts, yielding an overall picture of receptive
vocabulary learning across groups. The test also produces information about
individual language development that may help teaching. Implications include the
need for further research into the effects of learning environments on language
development, andvthe need for skilled intervention in additional language
development to continue throughout secondary schooling. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1362-1688 1477-0954 |
DOI: | 10.1191/1362168802lr103oa |