A Review of Mental Health Interventions in SAMHSA's National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs and Practices
Objective:This study identified and examined characteristics of mental health interventions listed in a registry of evidence-based behavioral health programs and practices. Methods:Data were from the National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs and Practices (NREPP), which is sponsored by the Substa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2011-03, Vol.62 (3), p.303-305 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective:This study identified and examined characteristics of mental health interventions listed in a registry of evidence-based behavioral health programs and practices.
Methods:Data were from the National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs and Practices (NREPP), which is sponsored by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. All mental health interventions posted as of May 2010 were reviewed.
Results:A total of 91 interventions were assessed. Over half (57%) focused on promoting mental health rather than on treating mental illness. The implementation materials and trainings for most interventions (52%) were proprietary. Analysis of NREPP's rated dimensions revealed that quality-of-research scores were significantly lower for interventions with exclusively proprietary materials, whereas readiness-for-dissemination scoreswere significantly lower for interventions with exclusively publicly available materials.
Conclusions:NREPP represents a practical tool for organizations seeking to initiate or expand their use of evidence-based services. Periodic studies of listed interventions may help to identify programmatic gaps in NREPP. (Psychiatric Services 62:303–305, 2011) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1075-2730 1557-9700 |
DOI: | 10.1176/ps.62.3.pss6203_0303 |