Can instructions to nonverbal IQ tests be given in pantomime? Additional applications of a general theory of signs
The long-standing claim that IQ tests measure innate ability & are language-independent is refuted by an application of general semiotics to existing studies of verbal & nonverbal IQ tests. Recent advances in semiotic theory are argued to establish conclusively that nonverbal IQ tests &...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Semiotica 2001-01, Vol.133 (133), p.15-44 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The long-standing claim that IQ tests measure innate ability & are language-independent is refuted by an application of general semiotics to existing studies of verbal & nonverbal IQ tests. Recent advances in semiotic theory are argued to establish conclusively that nonverbal IQ tests & the performance inventories of standardized IQ tests depend on conventional concepts for both their solutions & comprehension of instructions, as both require social consensus to be workable. Oller's (1975) notion of pragmatic mapping & his subsequent theories of true narrative representations & abstraction are summarized to show that sign systems depend on reliable sensory judgments & that social consensus regarding the objects of sensory judgments can only be attained using conventional signs of a shared language. The assessment of nonverbal abilities therefore depends on the signs of a particular language. 4 Figures, 54 References. J. Hitchcock |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0037-1998 1613-3692 |
DOI: | 10.1515/semi.2001.004 |