On the Compatibility of the Nostratic Theory with Data Obtained from the Study of the Turkic Languages
The debate between A. M. Shcherbak, a critic of the Nostratic theory (see LLBA 19/3, 8505042), & E. A. Khelimskiy, the proponent of the Nostratic theory (see LLBA 21/2, 8703305), is outlined with special attention to the question of whether liquids or sibilants were chronologically first in the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Voprosy iazykoznaniia 1989-05, Vol.38 (3), p.20-32 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | rus |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | The debate between A. M. Shcherbak, a critic of the Nostratic theory (see LLBA 19/3, 8505042), & E. A. Khelimskiy, the proponent of the Nostratic theory (see LLBA 21/2, 8703305), is outlined with special attention to the question of whether liquids or sibilants were chronologically first in the alternations r ~ z & l ~ s. Khelimskiy's arguments & evidence in support of the precedence of liquids over sibilants are found to be insufficient. 44 References. Z. Dubiel |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0373-658X |