Two Types of Locality

The notion that empty categories in government & binding theory must be "properly governed" entails a disjunctive definition of government. Examined are the implications of assuming a separation such that well-formedness conditions applying at PF are stated in terms of government, wher...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Linguistic inquiry 1987-10, Vol.18 (4), p.537-577
Hauptverfasser: Aoun, Joseph, Hornstein, Norbert, Lightfoot, David, Weinberg, Amy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The notion that empty categories in government & binding theory must be "properly governed" entails a disjunctive definition of government. Examined are the implications of assuming a separation such that well-formedness conditions applying at PF are stated in terms of government, whereasLF conditions dealing with binding relations are stated in other terms. These two distinct kinds of well-formedness conditions are paired & hold at different levels & cannot be substituted for one another. It is further argued that N. Chomsky's empty category principle (ECP) should be eliminated in favor of two separate types of locality requirements. The first condition, applying at PF, holds that empty categories must be governed by lexical head. The second, holding atLF, holds that anaphora must be bound in some local domain. It is shown that this change provides a formulation of universal grammar that has good explanatory power & is simpler than existing forms. 59 References. B. Annesser Murray
ISSN:0024-3892
1530-9150