Kapampangan syntax

The work reviewed presents a well-organized & data-filled analysis based primarily on the 1965 Aspects model of transformational-generative theory, but with 2 major departures: the subject is viewed as a surface phenomenon (following the suggestions of C. Fillmore ["The Case for Case"...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lingua 1975-06, Vol.36 (2-3), p.278-280
1. Verfasser: Reid, Lawrence A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The work reviewed presents a well-organized & data-filled analysis based primarily on the 1965 Aspects model of transformational-generative theory, but with 2 major departures: the subject is viewed as a surface phenomenon (following the suggestions of C. Fillmore ["The Case for Case" in Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. Universals of Linguistic Theory New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston]); & semantic case relations are introduced by utilizing context-sensitive sub-categorizational rules in terms of 7 cases--i.e., Agent, Objective, Dative, Benefactive, Instrumental, Terminus Locative, & Essive--for describing the prepositional phrase. The major processes described & illustrated in the body of the work are nominalization, topicalization, pronominalization, & interrogative formation--using 19 transformational rules operating on the output of 14 phrase structure rules. In the summary, the rules are all restated & ordered according to the argumentation presented in the body. It is an effective & interesting analysis accompanied by abundant useful data. D. Leffler
ISSN:0024-3841
DOI:10.1016/0024-3841(75)90020-0