Kapampangan syntax
The work reviewed presents a well-organized & data-filled analysis based primarily on the 1965 Aspects model of transformational-generative theory, but with 2 major departures: the subject is viewed as a surface phenomenon (following the suggestions of C. Fillmore ["The Case for Case"...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Lingua 1975-06, Vol.36 (2-3), p.278-280 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The work reviewed presents a well-organized & data-filled analysis based primarily on the 1965 Aspects model of transformational-generative theory, but with 2 major departures: the subject is viewed as a surface phenomenon (following the suggestions of C. Fillmore ["The Case for Case" in Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. Universals of Linguistic Theory New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston]); & semantic case relations are introduced by utilizing context-sensitive sub-categorizational rules in terms of 7 cases--i.e., Agent, Objective, Dative, Benefactive, Instrumental, Terminus Locative, & Essive--for describing the prepositional phrase. The major processes described & illustrated in the body of the work are nominalization, topicalization, pronominalization, & interrogative formation--using 19 transformational rules operating on the output of 14 phrase structure rules. In the summary, the rules are all restated & ordered according to the argumentation presented in the body. It is an effective & interesting analysis accompanied by abundant useful data. D. Leffler |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0024-3841 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0024-3841(75)90020-0 |