Pragmatic Knowledge: Rules and Procedures

Pragmatic Knowledge: Rules and Procedures

The question of how best to describe pragmatic knowledge in linguistic communication is addressed & three possible model types are distinguished: rules, procedures, & a rules & procedures combination. The rule & procedure approach is argued to be the most effective. A distinction bet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied linguistics 1984-01, Vol.5 (3), p.214-225
Hauptverfasser: FAERCH, CLAUS, KASPER, GABRIELE
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 225
container_issue 3
container_start_page 214
container_title Applied linguistics
container_volume 5
creator FAERCH, CLAUS
KASPER, GABRIELE
description The question of how best to describe pragmatic knowledge in linguistic communication is addressed & three possible model types are distinguished: rules, procedures, & a rules & procedures combination. The rule & procedure approach is argued to be the most effective. A distinction between declarative & procedural pragmatic knowledge is described & components of pragmatically relevant declarative knowledge are discussed. A model of how declarative & procedural knowledge are used in conversation is illustrated with a discussion of apologies. Emphasis is on conversations between native speakers, but implications for second-lang teaching are considered. 31 References. B. Annesser Murray
doi_str_mv 10.1093/applin/5.3.214
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85465972</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1300376305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a389t-1255461110056b38c83682122e3378fa4ed5d545fdb4401ff0feafb87e34f91a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLw0AUhQdRsFa3rgOC4CLp3LkzmcSd1EfFgvVJcTNMk5mSmiZxJkH990YqLly5umfxnQP3I-QQaAQ0xZFumrKoRiLCiAHfIgPgUoZc0Pk2GVDgLIwphV2y5_2qDyyJcUBOZk4v17otsuCmqt9Lky_NaXDflcYHusqDmaszk3fO-H2yY3XpzcHPHZKny4vH8SSc3l5dj8-mocYkbUNgQvAYACgV8QKTLME4YcCYQZSJ1dzkIhdc2HzBOQVrqTXaLhJpkNsUNA7J8Wa3cfVbZ3yr1oXPTFnqytSdV0k_L1LJ_gEiA8GwB4_-gKu6c1X_hAKkFGWMVPRUtKEyV3vvjFWNK9bafSqg6luw2ghWQqHqBfeFcFMofGs-fmntXlUsUQo1mb-oh3OczJl4Vnf4BZkOfAM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300376305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pragmatic Knowledge: Rules and Procedures</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>FAERCH, CLAUS ; KASPER, GABRIELE</creator><creatorcontrib>FAERCH, CLAUS ; KASPER, GABRIELE</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The question of how best to describe pragmatic knowledge in linguistic communication is addressed & three possible model types are distinguished: rules, procedures, & a rules & procedures combination. The rule & procedure approach is argued to be the most effective. A distinction between declarative & procedural pragmatic knowledge is described & components of pragmatically relevant declarative knowledge are discussed. A model of how declarative & procedural knowledge are used in conversation is illustrated with a discussion of apologies. Emphasis is on conversations between native speakers, but implications for second-lang teaching are considered. 31 References. B. Annesser Murray]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-6001</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-450X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/applin/5.3.214</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADLSDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Applied linguistics, 1984-01, Vol.5 (3), p.214-225</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a389t-1255461110056b38c83682122e3378fa4ed5d545fdb4401ff0feafb87e34f91a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27848,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>FAERCH, CLAUS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KASPER, GABRIELE</creatorcontrib><title>Pragmatic Knowledge: Rules and Procedures</title><title>Applied linguistics</title><description><![CDATA[The question of how best to describe pragmatic knowledge in linguistic communication is addressed & three possible model types are distinguished: rules, procedures, & a rules & procedures combination. The rule & procedure approach is argued to be the most effective. A distinction between declarative & procedural pragmatic knowledge is described & components of pragmatically relevant declarative knowledge are discussed. A model of how declarative & procedural knowledge are used in conversation is illustrated with a discussion of apologies. Emphasis is on conversations between native speakers, but implications for second-lang teaching are considered. 31 References. B. Annesser Murray]]></description><issn>0142-6001</issn><issn>1477-450X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtLw0AUhQdRsFa3rgOC4CLp3LkzmcSd1EfFgvVJcTNMk5mSmiZxJkH990YqLly5umfxnQP3I-QQaAQ0xZFumrKoRiLCiAHfIgPgUoZc0Pk2GVDgLIwphV2y5_2qDyyJcUBOZk4v17otsuCmqt9Lky_NaXDflcYHusqDmaszk3fO-H2yY3XpzcHPHZKny4vH8SSc3l5dj8-mocYkbUNgQvAYACgV8QKTLME4YcCYQZSJ1dzkIhdc2HzBOQVrqTXaLhJpkNsUNA7J8Wa3cfVbZ3yr1oXPTFnqytSdV0k_L1LJ_gEiA8GwB4_-gKu6c1X_hAKkFGWMVPRUtKEyV3vvjFWNK9bafSqg6luw2ghWQqHqBfeFcFMofGs-fmntXlUsUQo1mb-oh3OczJl4Vnf4BZkOfAM</recordid><startdate>19840101</startdate><enddate>19840101</enddate><creator>FAERCH, CLAUS</creator><creator>KASPER, GABRIELE</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EGZRM</scope><scope>HFXKP</scope><scope>HWXIY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OX</scope><scope>~OY</scope><scope>~P0</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19840101</creationdate><title>Pragmatic Knowledge: Rules and Procedures</title><author>FAERCH, CLAUS ; KASPER, GABRIELE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a389t-1255461110056b38c83682122e3378fa4ed5d545fdb4401ff0feafb87e34f91a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FAERCH, CLAUS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KASPER, GABRIELE</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 3.1</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 17</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 25</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 3 (purchase pre Aug/2005)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 3.4</collection><collection>PAO Collection 3 (purchase pre Aug/2005+extra titles)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Applied linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FAERCH, CLAUS</au><au>KASPER, GABRIELE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pragmatic Knowledge: Rules and Procedures</atitle><jtitle>Applied linguistics</jtitle><date>1984-01-01</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>214</spage><epage>225</epage><pages>214-225</pages><issn>0142-6001</issn><eissn>1477-450X</eissn><coden>ADLSDX</coden><abstract><![CDATA[The question of how best to describe pragmatic knowledge in linguistic communication is addressed & three possible model types are distinguished: rules, procedures, & a rules & procedures combination. The rule & procedure approach is argued to be the most effective. A distinction between declarative & procedural pragmatic knowledge is described & components of pragmatically relevant declarative knowledge are discussed. A model of how declarative & procedural knowledge are used in conversation is illustrated with a discussion of apologies. Emphasis is on conversations between native speakers, but implications for second-lang teaching are considered. 31 References. B. Annesser Murray]]></abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/applin/5.3.214</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0142-6001
ispartof Applied linguistics, 1984-01, Vol.5 (3), p.214-225
issn 0142-6001
1477-450X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85465972
source Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy; Periodicals Index Online
title Pragmatic Knowledge: Rules and Procedures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T04%3A03%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pragmatic%20Knowledge:%20Rules%20and%20Procedures&rft.jtitle=Applied%20linguistics&rft.au=FAERCH,%20CLAUS&rft.date=1984-01-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=214&rft.epage=225&rft.pages=214-225&rft.issn=0142-6001&rft.eissn=1477-450X&rft.coden=ADLSDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/applin/5.3.214&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1300376305%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300376305&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true