Convention T Regained

Convention T Regained

Davidson's use of Tarski's Convention T as part of a truth definition for natural language is defended against counterexamples offered by J. Hintikka. The alleged counterexamples are sentences beginning with "any" whose logical form is altered when placed in the context of a T-se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophical studies 1977-11, Vol.32 (4), p.377-381
1. Verfasser: Klagge, James C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Chalkboards
Counterexamples
Logical form
Logical theorems
Metalanguage
Sentences
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 381
container_issue 4
container_start_page 377
container_title Philosophical studies
container_volume 32
creator Klagge, James C.
description Davidson's use of Tarski's Convention T as part of a truth definition for natural language is defended against counterexamples offered by J. Hintikka. The alleged counterexamples are sentences beginning with "any" whose logical form is altered when placed in the context of a T-sentence. It is shown how a metalang can be selected so that this problem of context dependence does not arise. Finally, it is shown how Hintikka's sentences can be changed so that they resist automatic translation into their Davidsonian logical form. AA
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF00368692
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85438437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4319185</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4319185</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-12018c12248a1c1daeea16fc6694e3ee749438eefde8332d9126ae23ad4bf953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0EFLxDAQBeAgCq6rF8GbhwXBg1CdyaRpctTiqrAgyN5DbKfSpdusSVfw31tZUfA0MHxvGJ4QpwjXCFDc3M0BSBtt5Z6YYF5QBsbQvpiMa8wMoj4URymtAEDbXE3EWRn6D-6HNvSz5eyF33zbc30sDhrfJT75mVOxnN8vy8ds8fzwVN4uskoWMGQoAU2FUirjscLaM3vUTaW1VUzMhbKKDHNTsyGStUWpPUvytXptbE5Tcbk7u4nhfctpcOs2Vdx1vuewTc7kY1xRMcKLf3AVtrEfX3NIoHItSepRXe1UFUNKkRu3ie3ax0-H4L7rcX_1jPh8h1dpCPFXKkKLJqcvs2RdXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1304562326</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Convention T Regained</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Klagge, James C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Klagge, James C.</creatorcontrib><description>Davidson's use of Tarski's Convention T as part of a truth definition for natural language is defended against counterexamples offered by J. Hintikka. The alleged counterexamples are sentences beginning with "any" whose logical form is altered when placed in the context of a T-sentence. It is shown how a metalang can be selected so that this problem of context dependence does not arise. Finally, it is shown how Hintikka's sentences can be changed so that they resist automatic translation into their Davidsonian logical form. AA</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8116</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00368692</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLSDA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Minneapolis: D. Reidel Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Chalkboards ; Counterexamples ; Logical form ; Logical theorems ; Metalanguage ; Sentences</subject><ispartof>Philosophical studies, 1977-11, Vol.32 (4), p.377-381</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1977 D. Reidel Publishing Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-12018c12248a1c1daeea16fc6694e3ee749438eefde8332d9126ae23ad4bf953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4319185$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4319185$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klagge, James C.</creatorcontrib><title>Convention T Regained</title><title>Philosophical studies</title><description>Davidson's use of Tarski's Convention T as part of a truth definition for natural language is defended against counterexamples offered by J. Hintikka. The alleged counterexamples are sentences beginning with "any" whose logical form is altered when placed in the context of a T-sentence. It is shown how a metalang can be selected so that this problem of context dependence does not arise. Finally, it is shown how Hintikka's sentences can be changed so that they resist automatic translation into their Davidsonian logical form. AA</description><subject>Chalkboards</subject><subject>Counterexamples</subject><subject>Logical form</subject><subject>Logical theorems</subject><subject>Metalanguage</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><issn>0031-8116</issn><issn>1573-0883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1977</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AKNXY</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~P3</sourceid><sourceid>~PO</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0EFLxDAQBeAgCq6rF8GbhwXBg1CdyaRpctTiqrAgyN5DbKfSpdusSVfw31tZUfA0MHxvGJ4QpwjXCFDc3M0BSBtt5Z6YYF5QBsbQvpiMa8wMoj4URymtAEDbXE3EWRn6D-6HNvSz5eyF33zbc30sDhrfJT75mVOxnN8vy8ds8fzwVN4uskoWMGQoAU2FUirjscLaM3vUTaW1VUzMhbKKDHNTsyGStUWpPUvytXptbE5Tcbk7u4nhfctpcOs2Vdx1vuewTc7kY1xRMcKLf3AVtrEfX3NIoHItSepRXe1UFUNKkRu3ie3ax0-H4L7rcX_1jPh8h1dpCPFXKkKLJqcvs2RdXA</recordid><startdate>197711</startdate><enddate>197711</enddate><creator>Klagge, James C.</creator><general>D. Reidel Publishing Company</general><general>University of Minnesota Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>AKNXY</scope><scope>GHXMH</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>JWXEY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~P2</scope><scope>~P3</scope><scope>~PO</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197711</creationdate><title>Convention T Regained</title><author>Klagge, James C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-12018c12248a1c1daeea16fc6694e3ee749438eefde8332d9126ae23ad4bf953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1977</creationdate><topic>Chalkboards</topic><topic>Counterexamples</topic><topic>Logical form</topic><topic>Logical theorems</topic><topic>Metalanguage</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klagge, James C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 4 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 09</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 39</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 4</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 4</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 2</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klagge, James C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Convention T Regained</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical studies</jtitle><date>1977-11</date><risdate>1977</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>377</spage><epage>381</epage><pages>377-381</pages><issn>0031-8116</issn><eissn>1573-0883</eissn><coden>PLSDA3</coden><abstract>Davidson's use of Tarski's Convention T as part of a truth definition for natural language is defended against counterexamples offered by J. Hintikka. The alleged counterexamples are sentences beginning with "any" whose logical form is altered when placed in the context of a T-sentence. It is shown how a metalang can be selected so that this problem of context dependence does not arise. Finally, it is shown how Hintikka's sentences can be changed so that they resist automatic translation into their Davidsonian logical form. AA</abstract><cop>Minneapolis</cop><pub>D. Reidel Publishing Company</pub><doi>10.1007/BF00368692</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-8116
ispartof Philosophical studies, 1977-11, Vol.32 (4), p.377-381
issn 0031-8116
1573-0883
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85438437
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Chalkboards
Counterexamples
Logical form
Logical theorems
Metalanguage
Sentences
title Convention T Regained
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T12%3A52%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Convention%20T%20Regained&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20studies&rft.au=Klagge,%20James%20C.&rft.date=1977-11&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=377&rft.epage=381&rft.pages=377-381&rft.issn=0031-8116&rft.eissn=1573-0883&rft.coden=PLSDA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00368692&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4319185%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1304562326&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4319185&rfr_iscdi=true