Allogeneic blood transfusion in patients in Dukes B stage of colorectal cancer

The aim of this study is to evaluate influence of allogeneic blood transfusion on prognosis in patients in Dukes B stage of colorectal cancer. All patients with colorectal cancer who were admitted at our Department of Surgery between January 2000 and December 2004 were analyzed. One hundred fifty-on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) London, England), 2011-03, Vol.28 (1), p.170-174
Hauptverfasser: Zdravkovic, Darko, Bilanovic, Dragoljub, Randjelovic, Tomislav, Granic, Miroslav, Djukanovic, Blagoje, Ivanovic, Nebojsa, Dikic, Srdjan, Nikolic, Dejan, Zdravkovic, Marija, Soldatovic, Ivan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of this study is to evaluate influence of allogeneic blood transfusion on prognosis in patients in Dukes B stage of colorectal cancer. All patients with colorectal cancer who were admitted at our Department of Surgery between January 2000 and December 2004 were analyzed. One hundred fifty-one patients who fulfilled inclusion criteria were enrolled in further evaluation. B stage according to Dukes classification and curative resection were inclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria were polyposis syndromes, nonpolyposis syndromes, inflammatory bowel disease, autoimmune disease and previous blood transfusion. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 received ≤3 units of allogeneic blood transfusion and group 2 received >3 units of allogeneic blood transfusion. “Cutoff” value of 3 units of blood was defined according to our results and literature data. Follow-up was 5 year. There was no statistical difference between these groups in local recurrence (χ 2  = 0.009, P  > 0.05) and distant metastasis (χ 2   = 0.44, P  > 0.05). Also, the Kaplan–Meier survival curves were calculated, and long-rank test did not show a survival difference between these two groups (log rank = 0.075, P  > 0.05). Postoperative complications are significantly more frequent in Group 2 (χ 2  = 4.67, P  
ISSN:1357-0560
1559-131X
DOI:10.1007/s12032-010-9441-3