Origin of native sulfur ball from the Kueishantao hydrothermal field offshore northeast Taiwan: Evidence from trace and rare earth element composition

► We first report the trace and rare earth element compositions of native sulfur ball. ► The growth of the native sulfur ball is significantly slower than that of chimneys. ► A “glue pudding” growth model for understanding the origin of the native sulfur ball. We first report the trace and rare eart...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Asian earth sciences 2011-01, Vol.40 (2), p.661-671
Hauptverfasser: Zeng, Zhigang, Chen, Chen-Tung A., Yin, Xuebo, Zhang, Xueying, Wang, Xiaoyuan, Zhang, Guoliang, Wang, Xiaomei, Chen, Daigeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► We first report the trace and rare earth element compositions of native sulfur ball. ► The growth of the native sulfur ball is significantly slower than that of chimneys. ► A “glue pudding” growth model for understanding the origin of the native sulfur ball. We first report the trace and rare earth element compositions of native sulfur ball with sulfur contents varying from 97.08 wt.% to 99.85 wt.% from the Kueishantao hydrothermal field, off NE Taiwan. We then discuss the sources of trace and rare earth elements incorporated into the native sulfur ball during formation. Comparison of our results with native sulfur from crater lakes and other volcanic areas shows the sulfur content of native sulfur ball from the Kueishantao hydrothermal field is very high, and that the rare earth element (REE) and trace element constituents of the native sulfur balls are very low (∑REE < 35 ppb). In the native sulfur ball, V, Cr, Co, Ni, Nb, Rb, Cs, Ba, Pb, Th, U, Al, Ti and REE are mostly derived from andesite; Mg, K and Mn are mostly derived from seawater; and Fe, Cu, Zn and Ni are partly derived from magma. Based on the sulfur contents, trace and rare earth element compositions, and local environment, we suggest that the growth of the native sulfur ball is significantly slower than that of native sulfur chimneys, which results in the relatively higher contents of trace and rare earth element contents in the native sulfur ball than in the native sulfur chimneys from the Kueishantao hydrothermal field. Finally, we suggest a “glue pudding” growth model for understanding the origin of the native sulfur ball in the Kueishantao hydrothermal field, whereby the native sulfur ball forms from a mixture of oxygenated seawater and acidic, low-temperature hydrothermal fluid with H 2S and SO 2 gases, and is subsequently shaped by tidal and/or bottom currents.
ISSN:1367-9120
1878-5786
DOI:10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.10.019