A randomised controlled trial to assess pain with urethral swabs

BackgroundUrethral swabs are uncomfortable due to the nature of the mucosa and may be a reason for non-attendance of men at sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics. This randomised controlled trial describes the extent of discomfort associated with direct urethral sampling, and determines wheth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sexually transmitted infections 2011-03, Vol.87 (2), p.110-113
Hauptverfasser: Apoola, Ade, Herrero-Diaz, Maite, FitzHugh, Elley, Rajakumar, Raj, Fakis, Apostolos, Oakden, Jayne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundUrethral swabs are uncomfortable due to the nature of the mucosa and may be a reason for non-attendance of men at sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics. This randomised controlled trial describes the extent of discomfort associated with direct urethral sampling, and determines whether this varies by the type of swab used.MethodsMale patients over the age of 16 years having swab tests were invited to participate and were randomly assigned to receive either a gonorrhoea dacron-tipped swab, a chlamydia rayon-tipped swab or a plastic 10 μl urethral loop first for urethral sampling followed by the others sequentially. Discomfort was measured using a 0–100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS).Findings129 men having urethral swabs carried out as part of their screening tests for STI were invited to participate in the study and 121 were recruited. The median pain scores (IQR) regardless of sampling method, before and after the urethral sampling were, first 0 mm (0–0) and 50 mm (22–71) (p
ISSN:1368-4973
1472-3263
DOI:10.1136/sti.2010.042861