Twice-Daily, Preservative-Free Ketorolac 0.45% for Treatment of Inflammation and Pain After Cataract Surgery

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of twice-daily, preservative-free ketorolac 0.45% (Acuvail; Allergan, Inc, Irvine, California, USA) administration for treatment of inflammation and pain after cataract surgery. Design Prospective, randomized trial. Methods Two multicenter, double-masked s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of ophthalmology 2011-03, Vol.151 (3), p.420-426.e1
Hauptverfasser: Donnenfeld, Eric D, Nichamin, Louis D, Hardten, David R, Raizman, Michael B, Trattler, William, Rajpal, Rajesh K, Alpern, Louis M, Felix, Carlos, Bradford, Ronald R, Villanueva, Linda, Hollander, David A, Schiffman, Rhett M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of twice-daily, preservative-free ketorolac 0.45% (Acuvail; Allergan, Inc, Irvine, California, USA) administration for treatment of inflammation and pain after cataract surgery. Design Prospective, randomized trial. Methods Two multicenter, double-masked studies randomized 511 cataract surgery patients (2:1) to receive twice-daily ketorolac 0.45% or vehicle in the operative eye for 16 days, beginning 1 day before surgery. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of patients with a summed ocular inflammation score of 0 for anterior chamber cell and flare on postoperative day 14. The main secondary efficacy end point was the percentage of patients with no pain on postoperative day 1. Results On day 14, 52.5% of ketorolac patients and 26.5% of vehicle patients had an summed ocular inflammation score of 0 ( P < .001). On day 1, 72.4% of ketorolac patients and 39.7% of vehicle patients had a pain score of 0 ( P < .001). Median time to pain resolution was 1 day in the ketorolac group and 2 days in the vehicle group ( P < .001). The percentage of ketorolac and vehicle patients who had a +3-line or more improvement in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline was 60.5% versus 44.0% on day 14 ( P = .002). Overall, adverse events were more prevalent in the vehicle group than in the ketorolac group (48.5% vs 35.2%; P = .004). Burning or stinging (per a composite Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities) was reported by 1.5% of ketorolac patients and 0.6% of vehicle patients. Conclusions Twice-daily ketorolac 0.45% was well tolerated and effectively treated inflammation and pain following cataract surgery.
ISSN:0002-9394
1879-1891
DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.09.003