Does an objective system-based approach improve assessment of perioperative risk in children? A preliminary evaluation of the ‘NARCO’

This study evaluated whether an objective tool would provide a more reliable and valid assessment of perioperative risk compared with the ASA-physical status (ASA-PS) in children. A system-based risk assessment tool was developed using these categories: Neurological, Airway, Respiratory, Cardiovascu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2011-03, Vol.106 (3), p.352-358
Hauptverfasser: Malviya, S, Voepel-Lewis, T, Chiravuri, S.D., Gibbons, K, Chimbira, W.T., Nafiu, O.O., Reynolds, P.I., Tait, A.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study evaluated whether an objective tool would provide a more reliable and valid assessment of perioperative risk compared with the ASA-physical status (ASA-PS) in children. A system-based risk assessment tool was developed using these categories: Neurological, Airway, Respiratory, Cardiovascular, and Other (NARCO) with a subcomponent grading surgical severity (SS). Anaesthesiologists reviewed the preoperative assessments and assigned NARCO, SS, and ASA-PS scores independently. Perioperative outcomes were recorded by trained observers. Validity and reliability of the tools were evaluated. NARCO correlated with ASA-PS (ρ=0.664; P
ISSN:0007-0912
1471-6771
DOI:10.1093/bja/aeq398