Diagnostic value of confocal laser endomicroscopy for gastric superficial cancerous lesions

BackgroundThe identification of gastric superficial cancerous lesions based on conventional white-light endoscopy (WLE) is challenging, and histological analysis remains the ‘gold standard’ for the final diagnosis. Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) can provide in vivo histological observation with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 2011-03, Vol.60 (3), p.299-306
Hauptverfasser: Li, Wen-Bo, Zuo, Xiu-Li, Li, Chang-Qing, Zuo, Fang, Gu, Xiao-Meng, Yu, Tao, Chu, Chuan-Lian, Zhang, Ting-Guo, Li, Yan-Qing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundThe identification of gastric superficial cancerous lesions based on conventional white-light endoscopy (WLE) is challenging, and histological analysis remains the ‘gold standard’ for the final diagnosis. Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) can provide in vivo histological observation without the need for biopsy.ObjectiveTo develop and evaluate CLE imaging criteria for gastric superficial cancerous lesions and to compare the diagnostic value of real-time integrated CLE (iCLE) and WLE alone in distinguishing gastric superficial cancerous lesions.DesignProspective study.SettingQilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.PatientsA total of 182 patients were enrolled into phase I and 1786 patients were enrolled into phase II.InterventionsCLE images were blindly evaluated after endoscopy in phase I, and real-time iCLE diagnosis during endoscopy was compared with WLE diagnosis by using histopathology as a gold standard in phase II.Main outcome measurementsThe validity and reliability of the CLE diagnosis for identifying gastric superficial cancerous lesions.ResultsOff-line CLE diagnosis for early gastric cancers had a high sensitivity (88.1%) and specificity (98.6%). When the two-tiered CLE classification of non-cancerous lesions and cancer/high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) lesions was introduced, CLE diagnosis led to a higher sensitivity (90.2%) and specificity (98.5%) (phase I). Real-time iCLE diagnosis had a higher sensitivity (88.9%), specificity (99.3%) and accuracy (98.8%) for gastric superficial cancer/HGIN lesions than WLE diagnosis (sensitivity, 72.2%; specificity, 95.1%; and accuracy, 94.1%) (p
ISSN:0017-5749
1468-3288
DOI:10.1136/gut.2010.223586