Chloroprocaine vs. articaine as spinal anaesthetics for day-case knee arthroscopy

Background: Chloroprocaine and articaine have recently gained interest as short‐acting spinal anaesthetics. They have not, however, previously been compared in an ambulatory surgery setting. Methods: In this double‐blind, randomised, controlled trial, adult patients (≤65 years, ASA I–II, body mass i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2011-03, Vol.55 (3), p.273-281
Hauptverfasser:	FÖRSTER, J. G., KALLIO, H., ROSENBERG, P. H., HARILAINEN, A., SANDELIN, J., PITKÄNEN, M. T.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adult Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods Anesthesia Anesthesia, Spinal - methods Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Anesthetics, Local - pharmacology Arthroscopy - methods Biological and medical sciences Carticaine - pharmacology Double-Blind Method Female Humans Knee Joint - surgery Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Procaine - analogs & derivatives Procaine - pharmacology
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Background: Chloroprocaine and articaine have recently gained interest as short‐acting spinal anaesthetics. They have not, however, previously been compared in an ambulatory surgery setting. Methods: In this double‐blind, randomised, controlled trial, adult patients (≤65 years, ASA I–II, body mass index
ISSN:	0001-5172 1399-6576
DOI:	10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02325.x